Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )


	Filed by the Registrant þ
	Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

	Check the appropriate box:


	o Preliminary Proxy Statement
	o Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
	þ Definitive Proxy Statement
	o Definitive Additional Materials
	o Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12


	þ No fee required.
	o Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.


	3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):


	o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held May ~~15, 2008~~10, 2011

To the Stockholders of

TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.:

The annual meeting of stockholders will be held in Dallas, Texas at the Park City Club, 5956 Sherry Lane, Suite 1700, at 9:30 a.m., local time. At the meeting, you will be asked to:

	(1)		elect seven directors to serve until the next annual meeting or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified;

	(2)		consider and vote upon a proposal to amend the Tyler Technologies, Inc. Stock Option Plan (the “Stock Option Plan”) to increase the number of our common stock subject to the Stock Option Plan by 2,500,000;

	~~(3)~~		ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors for fiscal year ~~2008;~~2011;

	(3)		approve an advisory resolution on our executive compensation;

	(4)		approve an advisory resolution on the frequency of stockholder voting on our executive compensation; and

	~~(4)~~(5)		transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

Only stockholders of record on March ~~17, 2008~~18, 2011 may vote at the annual meeting. A list of those stockholders will be available for examination at our corporate headquarters, 5949 Sherry Lane, Suite 1400, Dallas, Texas 75225, from May 51 through May ~~15, 2008.~~10, 2011.

Please date and sign the enclosed proxy card and return it promptly in the enclosed envelope or vote through the Internet as described inon the enclosed proxy card.No postage is required if the proxy card is mailed in the United States. Your prompt response will reduce the time and expense of solicitation.

The enclosed ~~2007~~2010 Annual Report does not form any part of the proxy solicitation material.


		By Order of the Board of Directors


		H. Lynn Moore, Jr.
		Executive Vice President,
		General Counsel, and Secretary

Dallas, Texas
April ~~2, 2008~~1, 2011

THE ANNUAL MEETING

~~Place, Date, and Time~~General Information

The annual meeting will be held in Dallas, Texas at the Park City Club, 5956 Sherry Lane, Suite 1700, on ~~Thursday,~~Tuesday, May ~~15, 2008,~~10, 2011, at 9:30 a.m., local time.

~~Matters to be Considered~~

At the annual meeting, you will be asked to consider and vote upon the following proposals:

	•		Proposal One — Election of seven directors to serve until the next annual meeting or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified;

	•		Proposal Two — ~~Amendment to the Stock Option Plan increasing the number of shares of common stock subject to issuance under the Option Plan from 8,500,000 to 11,000,000; and~~

	•		~~Proposal Three —~~ Ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors for fiscal year ~~2008.~~2011;

	•		Proposal Three — Approval of an advisory resolution on our executive compensation; and

	•		Proposal Four — Approval of an advisory resolution on the frequency of stockholder voting on our executive compensation.

~~Record Date and Voting~~

Only stockholders of record on March ~~17, 2008~~18, 2011 are entitled to vote at the annual meeting. On March ~~17, 2008,~~18, 2011, we had ~~37,981,782~~32,051,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. Each stockholder will be entitled to one vote, in person or by proxy, for each share of common stock held in his or her name. A majority of our shares of common stock must be present, either in person or by proxy, to constitute a quorum for action at the annual meeting.

If your shares are held in “street name” (the name of a broker, bank, or other nominee), you have the right to direct your broker, bank, or nominee how to vote. If you do not provide voting instructions, under New York Stock Exchange rules your broker, bank, or nominee may only vote your shares on “discretionary” items. Proposal Two regarding ratification of our independent auditors is considered a discretionary item and may be voted in the absence of instructions. Proposals One (election of directors), Three (advisory vote on executive compensation), and Four (advisory vote on frequency of stockholder voting on executive compensation) are, however, “non-discretionary” items. Your broker, bank, or nominee may not vote your shares on these non-discretionary items in the absence of voting instructions, which will result in “broker non-votes” with respect to your shares.

Abstentions and broker ~~nonvotes~~non-votes are counted for purposes of determining a quorum. Abstentions are counted in tabulating the votes cast on any proposal, but are not counted as votes either for or against a proposal. Broker ~~nonvotes~~non-votes are not counted as votes cast for purposes of determining whether a proposal has been approved.

~~Vote Required~~

~~The following is the required vote necessary to approve each of the proposals:~~

	•		~~Proposal One — Election of Directors — the election of directors is determined by plurality vote;~~

	•		Proposal Two — Amendment to Stock Option Plan — the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares actually voted at the annual meeting is required to approve the amendment to the Stock Option Plan; and

	•		Proposal Three — Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP — the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares actually voted at the annual meeting is required to ratify Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors for fiscal year 2008.

Proxy Solicitation, Revocation, and Expense

The accompanying proxy is being solicited on behalf of the ~~board~~Board of ~~directors.~~Directors. Your shares will be voted at the annual meeting as you direct in the enclosed proxy or through the Internet, provided that itthe proxy is completed, signed, and returned to us prior to the annual meeting. No proxy can vote for more than seven nominees for director. If you return a proxy but fail to indicate how you wish your shares to be voted, then your shares will be voted in favor of each of the nominees for director.

After you sign and return your proxy, you may revoke it prior to the meeting either by (i) filing a written notice of revocation at our corporate headquarters, (ii) attending the annual meeting and voting your shares in person, or (iii) delivering to us another duly executed proxy that is dated after the initial proxy.

We will bear the expense of preparing, printing, and mailing the proxy solicitation material and the proxy. In addition to use of the mail, we may solicit proxies by personal interview or telephone by our directors, officers, and employees. We may also engage the services of a proxy solicitation firm to assist us in the solicitation of proxies. We estimate that the fee of any such firm will not exceed $10,000 plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket

PROPOSALS FOR CONSIDERATION

Proposal One — Election of Directors

At the annual meeting, you will be asked to elect a board of seven directors. The election of directors shall be determined by plurality vote.

The nominees for director are: Donald R. Brattain; J. Luther King, Jr.; John S. Marr, Jr.; G. Stuart Reeves; Michael D. Richards; Dustin R. Womble; and John M. Yeaman. Each of the nominees currently serves on our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors.~~Directors. For more information regarding these nominees and their qualifications, see “Tyler Management.”

Each nominee has indicated that he is able and willing to serve as a director. If any of the nominees becomes unable to serve prior to the meeting, the persons named in the enclosed proxy will vote the shares covered by your executed proxy for a substitute nominee as selected by the ~~board~~Board of ~~directors.~~Directors. You may withhold authority to vote for any nominee by entering his name in the space provided on the proxy card.

Our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors unanimously recommends that the stockholders voteFOR each of the nominees for director.

Proposal Two — ~~Amendment to the Stock Option Plan~~

At the annual meeting, you will also be asked to consider and vote upon a proposal to amend the Stock Option Plan to increase the number of shares of common stock subject to the plan from 8,500,000 to 11,000,000. The proposed amendment to the plan is intended to enable us to provide additional incentives to selected key employees whose substantial contributions are important to our continued growth and profitability. Currently, there are only 206,000 shares of our common stock available for option grants under the existing plan. Copies of the Stock Option Plan are available upon written request.

~~Purpose of the Stock Option Plan~~. Stock options are designed to strengthen the commitment of selected key employees, directors, and non-employee consultants, to motivate those individuals to perform their assigned responsibilities diligently and skillfully, and to attract and retain competent entrepreneurial-type management dedicated to our long-term growth and profitability. We believe this can best be accomplished by tying a portion of compensation to appreciation in the market value of our common stock so that the management and key employees, non-employee directors, and non-employee consultants are rewarded only if the value of your investment in our common stock has appreciated.

~~Description of the Stock Option Plan~~. The Stock Option Plan is designed to permit the appropriate administering committee to grant options to key employees, directors, and non-employee consultants to purchase shares of our common stock. The plan requires that the purchase price under each stock option will not be less than 100% of the fair market value of our common stock at the time of the grant of the option. The fair market value per share is the reported closing price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of the grant of the option, or if no sale has been reported on such date, on the next preceding day or the last day prior to the date of grant when the sale was reported. The option period may not be more than ten years from the date the option is granted. Except with respect to options granted to officers and directors, the Executive Committee grants options to eligible individuals, determines the purchase price and option period at the time the option is granted, and administers and interprets the plan. The Compensation Committee grants options and administers the plan with respect to officers, and our board of directors, as a whole, grants options and administers the plan with respect to directors. Options may be exercised in annual installments as specified by the administering committee or, if applicable, our board of directors. All installments that become exercisable are cumulative and may be exercised at any time after they become exercisable until expiration of the option. The Stock Option Plan contains provisions governing “Changes of Control,” as defined therein, including accelerated vesting of options under certain circumstances.

The exercise price of options is paid in cash or by check at the time of exercise or, if approved, by the tender of shares of our common stock, or through a combination thereof; provided that such shares either: (i) have been owned by the optionee for more than six months and have been “paid for” within the meaning of Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933; or (ii) were obtained by the optionee in the public market (“Qualifying Shares”). If the option is exercised by tendering Qualifying Shares, the number of shares tendered shall be determined by the fair market value per share on the date of the exercise, as determined by us. An option agreement may also provide that the exercise price may be paid through the cashless exercise method whereby the optionee authorizes a broker designated by us to sell a specified number of the shares of common stock to be acquired by the optionee on the exercise of the option, having a then fair market value equal to the sum of the exercise price of the option, plus any transaction costs. The remainder of the shares not sold will be delivered to the optionee. Shares of common stock deliverable upon exercise of the options may be transferred from treasury or issued from authorized but unissued shares.

The Stock Option Plan will terminate on May 11, 2010, and no options may thereafter be granted under the plan. Our board of directors may amend, alter, or discontinue the plan, or any part thereof, at any time and for any reason. However, we will obtain stockholder approval for any amendment to the plan to the extent necessary and desirable to comply with applicable law. The administering committee may also make appropriate adjustments in the number of shares covered by the plan, the number of shares subject to outstanding options, and the option prices to reflect any stock dividend, stock split, share combination, or other recapitalization and, with respect to outstanding options and option prices, to reflect any merger, consolidation, reorganization, liquidation, or similar transaction.

Incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options may be granted under the plan to our key employees. Key employees are defined in the plan to be those employees whose performance and responsibilities are determined to have a direct and significant effect on our success. Non-employee directors, as well as consultants, are eligible for the grant of nonqualified stock options. Additional options may be granted to persons to whom options have previously been granted. There is no restriction in the plan on the maximum or minimum number of shares covered by options that may be granted to any person.

Incentive stock options are options that meet the requirements of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and nonqualified stock options are options that do not meet the requirements of Section 422 of the Code. No incentive stock option, however, may be granted under the Stock Option Plan to an employee who owns more than 10% of the voting power of all classes of securities unless the option price is at least 110% of the fair market value of our common stock at the date of grant, and the option is not exercisable more than five years after it is granted. There is no limit on the fair market value of incentive stock options that may be granted to an employee in any calendar year, but no employee may be granted incentive stock options that first become exercisable during a calendar year for the purchase of stock with an aggregate fair market value (determined as of the date of grant of each option) in excess of $100,000. An incentive stock option (or an installment thereof) counts against the annual limitation only in the year it first becomes exercisable.

The appropriate administering committee may provide for the termination of options in case of termination of employment, directorship, consultant relationship, dishonesty, or any other reason the appropriate committee determines. If an option expires or terminates before it has been exercised in full, the shares of common stock allocable to the unexercised portion of that option may become subject to future grants of options. Upon termination of the employment, directorship, or consultant relationship of an optionee, his or her option is exercisable for a period of 30 days after termination, and thereafter the option terminates. If the optionee dies or becomes disabled before the termination of his right to exercise his or her option, the legal representatives of the estate, or the optionee in the event of his disability, may exercise his or her option provided the option is exercised prior to the date of expiration of the option period or one year from the date of the optionee’s death or disability, whichever first occurs, and the option may be exercised only as to those shares the optionee could have purchased under the option on the date of death, disability or other termination. Options may not be transferred other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution and, during the lifetime of the optionee, may be exercised only by him.

~~Tax Status of Options~~. An optionee has no taxable income, and we are not entitled to a deduction, at the time of the grant of an option. All stock options that qualify under the rules of Section 422 of the Code will be entitled to “incentive stock option” treatment. To receive incentive stock option treatment, an optionee must not dispose of the

acquired stock within two years after the option is granted and within one year after the exercise. In addition, the individual must have been an employee for the entire time from the date of granting of the option until three months (one year if the employee is disabled) before the date of the exercise. The requirement that the individual be an employee and the two-year and one-year holding periods are waived in the case of death of the employee. If all such requirements are met, then any gain upon sale of the stock will be entitled to capital gain treatment. The employee’s gain on exercise (the excess of the fair market value at the time of exercise over the exercise price) of an incentive stock option is a tax preference item and, accordingly, is included in the computation of alternative minimum taxable income, even though it is not included in taxable income for purposes of determining regular tax liability of an employee. Consequently, an optionee may be obligated to pay alternative minimum tax in the year he or she exercises an incentive stock option.

If an employee does not meet the two-year and one-year holding requirement (a “disqualifying disposition”), tax will be imposed at the time of sale of the stock. In such event, the employee’s gain on exercise of the incentive stock option will be compensation to him taxed as ordinary income rather than capital gain to the extent the fair market value of the acquired common stock on the date of exercise of the incentive stock option exceeds the aggregate exercise price paid for that common stock, and we will be entitled to a corresponding deduction at the time of sale. If the amount realized on the disqualifying disposition is less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of exercise of the incentive stock option, the total amount includable in optionee’s gross income, and the amount deductible by us, will equal the excess of the amount realized on the disqualifying disposition over the exercise price.

An optionee, upon exercise of a nonqualified stock option that does not qualify as an incentive stock option, recognizes ordinary income in an amount equal to the gain on exercise. The exercise of a nonqualified stock option entitles us to a tax deduction in the same amount as is includable in the income of the optionee for the year in which the exercise occurred. Any gain or loss realized by an optionee on subsequent disposition of shares generally is a capital gain or loss and does not result in any tax deduction to us.

~~Different tax consequences may result from stock-for-stock exercises of options.~~

THE FOREGOING SUMMARY OF THE EFFECT OF THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX UPON PARTICIPANTS IN THE STOCK OPTION PLAN DOES NOT PURPORT TO BE COMPLETE, AND IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE PARTICIPANTS CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS FOR COUNSELING. MOREOVER, THE FOREGOING SUMMARY IS BASED UPON PRESENT FEDERAL INCOME TAX LAWS AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE. THE TAX TREATMENT UNDER FOREIGN, STATE, OR LOCAL LAW IS NOT COVERED IN THIS SUMMARY.

~~Our board of directors unanimously recommends that the stockholders vote~~~~FOR~~ ~~the amendment to the Stock Option Plan.~~

~~Proposal Three —~~ Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as Our Independent Auditors for Fiscal Year ~~2008~~2011

The Audit Committee has selected Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, as our independent auditors for fiscal year ~~2008,~~2011, subject to ratification by the stockholders. The affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares actually voted at the annual meeting is required to ratify Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors for fiscal year 2011.

Ernst & Young LLP served as our independent auditors for fiscal years ~~2007~~2010 and ~~2006.~~2009. A representative of Ernst & Young LLP is expected to be present at the annual meeting. That representative will have an opportunity to make a statement, if desired, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Ernst & Young’s fees for all professional services during each of the last two fiscal years were as follows:


	2007		2006		2010		2009
Audit Fees	$	1,069,000	$	1,020,000	$	1,054,000	$	1,129,000
Audit Related Fees		51,000		110,000		25,000		18,000
Tax Fees		11,000		28,000		44,000		29,000

Total	$	1,131,000	$	1,158,000	$	1,123,000	$	1,176,000

Audit Fees. Fees for audit services include fees associated with the annual audit, the review of our interim financial statements, and the auditor’s opinions related to internal control over financial reporting required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

Audit-Related Fees. Fees for audit-related services generally include fees for accounting consultations and Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings.

Tax Fees. Fees for tax services include fees for tax consulting and tax compliance.

All Other Fees. We did not engage Ernst & Young LLP for any other services in 2010 or 2009.

The Audit Committee approved all of the independent auditor engagements and fees presented above. Our Audit Committee Charter requires that the Audit Committee pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided to us by our independent auditors. All such services performed in ~~2007~~2010 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee. For more information on these policies and procedures, see ~~“Corporate~~“Board of Directors and Corporate Governance Principles ~~and Board Matters~~ — Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures for Audit and Non-Audit Services.”

Our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors unanimously recommends that the stockholders voteFOR the ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors for fiscal year ~~2008.~~2011.

Proposal Three — Approval of an Advisory Resolution on Our Executive Compensation

The following proposal gives our stockholders the opportunity to vote to approve or not approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers identified in this proxy statement. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our Named Executive Officers and our compensation philosophy, policies, and practices, as disclosed under the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Executive Compensation” sections of this proxy statement. We are providing this vote as required by Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Accordingly, for the reasons discussed in the “Compensation Discussion & Analysis” section of this proxy statement, we are asking our stockholders to vote “FOR” the adoption of the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the stockholders of Tyler Technologies, Inc. approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of Tyler Technologies’ named executive officers as disclosed in the Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.”

The advisory resolution on our executive compensation will be approved if holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares actually voted at the annual meeting vote in favor of the proposal.

Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding on either the Board of Directors or the Company. However, our Compensation Committee, which is composed solely of independent directors, will take into account the outcome of the stockholder vote on this proposal when considering future executive compensation arrangements. In addition, your non-binding advisory votes described in this Proposal Three and below in Proposal Four will not be construed (1) as overruling any decision by the Board of Directors, any Board committee, or the Company relating to the compensation of the Named Executive Officers or (2) as creating or changing any fiduciary duties or other duties on the part of the Board of Directors, any Board committee, or the Company.

Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that the stockholders voteFOR the advisory resolution on our executive compensation.

Proposal Four — Approval of an Advisory Resolution on the Frequency of Stockholder Voting on Our Executive Compensation

The following proposal gives our stockholders the opportunity to vote, on an advisory basis, on the frequency with which we include in our proxy statement an advisory vote, similar to Proposal Three above, to approve or not approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. By voting on this proposal, stockholders may indicate whether they prefer that we seek such an advisory vote every one, two, or three years. Pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, we are required to hold at least once every six years an advisory stockholder vote to determine the frequency of the advisory stockholder vote on executive compensation.

After careful consideration of this proposal, our Board of Directors determined that an advisory vote on executive compensation that occurs every three years is the most appropriate alternative for us and therefore recommends a vote for a triennial advisory vote. In reaching its recommendation, our Board primarily considered that a triennial advisory vote would permit the pay for performance elements of our compensation programs to be judged over a period of time. Our Board believes that a well-structured compensation program should include employment agreements and plans that drive creation of stockholder value over the long term and do not focus on short-term gains and that the effectiveness of such plans cannot be adequately evaluated on an annual basis.

You may cast your vote on your preferred voting frequency by selecting the option of holding an advisory vote on executive compensation “EVERY THREE YEARS,” as recommended by the Board of Directors, “EVERY TWO YEARS” or “EVERY ONE YEAR,” or you may “ABSTAIN.” Your vote is not intended to approve or disapprove the recommendation of the Board of Directors. Rather, we will consider the stockholders to have expressed a preference for the option that receives the most votes. However, because this vote is advisory and not binding on either the Board of Directors or the Company, the Board of Directors may subsequently decide that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation that differs in frequency from the option that received the highest number of votes from the stockholders.

Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers be held “EVERY THREE YEARS.”

TYLER MANAGEMENT

Directors, Nominees for Director, and Executive Officers

Below is a brief description of our directors, nominees for director, and executive officers. Each director holds office until our next annual meeting or until his successor is elected and qualified. Executive officers are elected annually by the ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors and hold office until the next annual board meeting or until their successors are elected and qualified.


Name / Age	Present Position	Served Since
John M. Yeaman, 6770	Chairman of the Board		2004
	Director		1999
John S. Marr, Jr., 4851	President and Chief Executive Officer		2004
	Director		2002
Donald R. Brattain, 6770	Director		2004
J. Luther King, Jr., 6871	Director		2004
G. Stuart Reeves, 6871	Director		2001
Michael D. Richards, 5760	Director		2002
Dustin R. Womble, 4851	Executive Vice President		2003
	Director		2005
Brian K. Miller, 4952	Executive Vice President		2008
	Chief Financial Officer		2005
	Treasurer		1997
H. Lynn Moore, Jr., 4043	Executive Vice President		2008
	Secretary		2000
	General Counsel		1998

Business Experience of Directors, Nominees for Director, and Executive Officers

John M. Yeamanhas served as Chairman of the Board since July 2004. From April 2002 until July 2004, Mr. Yeaman served as President and Chief Executive Officer; from March 2000 until April 2002, he served as President and Co-Chief Executive Officer; and from December 1998 until March 2000, he was President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Yeaman was elected to our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors in February 1999. Mr. Yeaman also serves as Chairman of the Executive Committee. From 1980 until 1998, Mr. Yeaman was associated with Electronic Data Systems Corporation (“EDS”)~~, where he most recently served as the director of a worldwide Strategic Support Unit managing $2 billion in real estate assets.~~. Mr. Yeaman began his career with Eastman Kodak Company.

John S. Marr, Jr.has served as President and Chief Executive Officer since July 2004. From July 2003 until July 2004, Mr. Marr served as Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Marr has served on our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors since May 2002 and is currently a member of the Executive Committee. Mr. Marr also served as President of MUNIS, Inc. (“MUNIS”) from 1994 until July 2004. Mr. Marr began his career in 1983 with MUNIS, a provider of a wide range of software products and related services for county and city governments, schools, and not-for-profit organizations, with a focus on integrated financial systems. We acquired MUNIS in 1999. Mr. Marr also serves on the ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors of Mercy Hospital in Portland, Maine.

Donald R. Brattainhas served as a director since 2004. Mr. Brattain also serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee and is a member of the Nominating and Governance Committee. Since 1985, Mr. Brattain has served as President of Brattain & Associates, LLC, a private investment company founded by Mr. Brattain in 1985 and located in Minneapolis, Minnesota. From 1981 until 1988, Mr. Brattain purchased and operated Barefoot Grass Lawn Service Company, a company that grew from $3.2 million in sales to over $100 million in sales and was sold to ServiceMaster, Ltd. in 1998.

J. Luther King, Jr.has served as a director since 2004. Mr. King also serves on the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee. Mr. King is the Chief Executive Officer and President of Luther King Capital Management (“LKCM”), a registered investment advisory firm that he founded in 1979. Mr. King also serves as ~~the chairman~~a director and a member of the ~~board~~Audit Committee of ~~trustees of Texas Christian University.~~Encore Energy Partners GP, LLC. In addition, Mr. King serves as a director on various private and ~~a member~~non-profit entities and foundations, including Chairman of the ~~audit committee~~Board of ~~Encore Energy Partners GP, LLC. Mr. King has a Bachelor~~Trustees of ~~Science degree and a Masters of Business Administration from~~

Texas Christian University, Advisory Committee of the Employees Retirement System of Texas, Trustee of LKCM Funds, and hedirector of Hunt Forest Products, Inc. Mr. King is ~~also~~ a Chartered Financial Analyst.

G. Stuart Reeveshas served on our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors since June 2001. Mr. Reeves also serves as Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee and is a member of the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee. From 1967 to 1999, Mr. Reeves worked for EDS, a professional services company that offers its clients a portfolio of related systems worldwide within the broad categories of systems and technology services, business process management, management consulting, and electronic business.company. During his ~~thirty-two~~32 years of service with EDS, Mr. Reeves held a variety of positions, including Executive Vice President, North and South America, ~~from 1996 to 1999;~~ Senior Vice President, Europe, Middle East, and Africa, ~~from 1990 to 1996;~~ Senior Vice President, Government Services Group, ~~from 1988 to 1990;~~ Corporate Vice President, Human Resources, ~~from 1984 to 1988;~~ Corporate Vice President, Financial Services Division, ~~from 1979 to 1984;~~ Project Sales Team Manager, ~~from 1974 to 1979;~~ and Systems Engineer and Sales ~~Executive, from 1967 to 1974. Mr. Reeves also served on the EDS Board of Directors from 1988 until 1996.~~Executive. Mr. Reeves retired from EDS in 1999. ~~Mr. Reeves also serves on the Board of Governors of Oklahoma State University Foundation.~~

Michael D. Richardshas served on our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors since May 2002. Mr. Richards also serves as Chairman of the Compensation Committee and is a member of the Nominating and Governance Committee. Mr. Richards is Executive Vice President of Republic Title of Texas, Inc. From September 2000 until September 2005, Mr. Richards served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Suburban Title, LLC d/b/a Reunion Title, an independent title insurance agency founded by Mr. Richards in September 2000 and which he sold to Republic Title in September 2005. From 1989 until September 2000, Mr. Richards served as President and Chief Executive Officer of American Title Company, Dallas, Texas, an affiliate of American Title Group, Inc., one of the largest title insurance underwriters in Texas during that time. From 1982 until 1989, Mr. Richards held various management positions with Hexter-Fair Title Company, Dallas, Texas, including President from 1988 until 1989. From 1974 until 1982, Mr. Richards worked for Stewart Title Guaranty Company, Dallas, Texas, during which time he held several key management positions including serving on its board of directors. Mr. Richards holds several positions with various associations, some of which include: Greater Dallas Chamber of Commerce, member of the Economic Development Advisory Council; Leukemia Society of America, Advisory Board Member; Greater Dallas Association of Realtors, Board Member; Home Builders Association, Board Member; and member of the executive committee of the Texas Stampede.

Dustin R. Womblehas been Executive Vice President in charge of corporate-wide product strategy, Chief Executive Officer of both our Courts and Justice division and our ~~INCODE~~Local Government division since July 2006 and is currently a member of the Executive Committee. From July 2003 to June 2006, Mr. Womble was Executive Vice President

in charge of corporate-wide product strategy and President of our ~~INCODE~~Local Government division. Mr. Womble founded and previously served as President of our ~~INCODE~~Local Government (formerly INCODE) division from 1998, when we acquired ~~INCODE,~~the Local Government division, to July 2003.

Brian K. Millerhas been Executive Vice President — Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since February 2008. From May 2005 until February 2008, Mr. Miller served as Senior Vice President ~~- -~~— Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. He previously served as Vice President — Finance and Treasurer from May 1999 to April 2005 and was Vice President — Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer from December 1997 to April 1999. From June 1986 through December 1997, Mr. Miller held various senior financial management positions at Metro Airlines, Inc. (“Metro”), a publicly-held regional airline holding company operating as American Eagle. Mr. Miller was Chief Financial Officer of Metro from May 1991 to December 1997 and also held the office of President of Metro from January 1993 to December 1997. Mr. Miller is a certified public accountant.

H. Lynn Moore, Jr.has been General Counsel since September 1998 and has been Secretary since October 2000 and Executive Vice President since February 2008. He previously served as Vice President from October 2000 until February 2008. From August 1992 to August 1998, Mr. Moore was associated with the law firm of Hughes & Luce, L.L.P. in Dallas, Texas where he represented numerous publicly-held and privately-owned entities in various corporate and securities, finance, litigation, and other legal related matters. Mr. Moore is a member of the State Bar of Texas.

Board Diversity and Nominee Qualifications

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines include the criteria our Board of Directors believes are important in the selection of director nominees, which includes the following qualifications:

	•		sound personal and professional integrity;

	•		an inquiring and independent mind;

	•		practical wisdom and mature judgment;

	•		broad training and experience at the policy-making level of business, finance and accounting, government, education, or technology;

	•		expertise that is useful to Tyler and complementary to the background and experience of other board members, so that an optimal balance of board members can be achieved and maintained;

	•		willingness to devote the required time to carrying out the duties and responsibilities of board membership;

	•		commitment to serve on the board for several years to develop knowledge about our business;

	•		willingness to represent the best interests of all stockholders and objectively appraise management performance; and

	•		involvement only in activities or interests that do not conflict with the director’s responsibilities to Tyler or our stockholders.

In identifying nominees for director, the Board focuses on ensuring that it reflects a diversity of experiences and backgrounds that will complement our business and enhance the function of the Board. The Board prefers a mix of background and experience among its members. The Board has not adopted a formal policy with respect to its consideration of diversity and does not follow any ratio or formula to determine the appropriate mix; rather, it uses its judgment to identify nominees whose backgrounds, attributes, and experiences, taken as a whole, will contribute to the high standards of board service. Our Board of Directors is composed of seven individuals, consisting of four independent directors and three employee directors. We believe the mix of outside experience from our independent directors coupled with the specific industry experience of our employee directors provides an appropriate diversity of experience to effectively manage our business. In addition, each independent director has extensive chief executive officer experience with businesses of varying size in various industries. Some independent directors have direct public company experience, while others have smaller, private company experience. Each director has valuable experience in building and sustaining a successful business enterprise.

The Nominating and Governance Committee believes that the above-mentioned attributes, along with the leadership skills and other experiences of its board members described below, provide us with the perspectives and judgment necessary to guide our strategies and monitor their execution:


Donald R. Brattain:	—	Private investment management experience as President of Brattain & Associates, LLC

	—	Executive and entrepreneurial experience in growth of a small business enterprise from $3.2 million in sales to over $100 million in sales

J. Luther King, Jr.:	—	Executive equity management experience as founder of Luther King Capital Management, a registered investment advisory firm

	—	Outside board experience as a director of Encore Energy Partners GP, LLC and other institutions

	—	Experience as a university trustee

G. Stuart Reeves	—	Extensive public company leadership experience with 32 years of service at EDS in various senior level capacities

	—	Outside board experience as a former director of EDS

Michael D. Richards	—	Executive and entrepreneurial experience as founder of Suburban Title LLC

	—	Outside board and advisory council service with various entities, including the Greater Dallas Chamber of Commerce


John S. Marr, Jr.	—	Chief Executive Officer of Tyler since 2004

	—	Over 28 years of specific industry experience, including chief executive experience with MUNIS, Inc., which Tyler acquired in 1999

	—	Outside board experience as a director of Mercy Hospital in Portland, Maine

Dustin R. Womble	—	Senior-level executive experience at Tyler since 2003

	—	Over 30 years of specific industry experience as founder of INCODE, Inc., which Tyler acquired in 1998

John M. Yeaman	—	President of Tyler from 1998 through 2004

	—	Over 19 years of public company executive experience at EDS

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES ~~AND BOARD MATTERS~~

General Information

Our Board of Directors is responsible for supervision of the overall affairs of Tyler. To assist it in carrying out its duties, the Board has delegated certain authority to several committees. See “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance Principles — Committees and Meetings of the Board of Directors.” Following the Annual Meeting in 2011, the Board will consist of seven directors, including four independent directors.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

Our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors has adopted a number of corporate governance guidelines, including the following:

	•		Independence Standards, which determine the independence of our non-employee directors. These standards are consistent with the independence standards set forth in Rule ~~303A.02(b)~~303A.02 of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual. The Independence Standards are included as an exhibit to our Audit Committee Charter.

	•		Corporate Governance Guidelines, which include, among other things:

	•		annual submission of independent auditors to stockholders for approval;

	•		formation of a Nominating and Governance Committee to be comprised solely of independent directors;

	•		prohibition of stock option re-pricing;

	•		formalization of the ability of independent directors to retain outside advisors;

	•		performance of periodic formal ~~board~~Board evaluation; and

	•		limitation on the number of additional public company boards on which a director may serve to a maximum of four.

			A copy of our Corporate Governance Guidelines may be found on our Website,~~www.tylertech.com~~. www.tylertech.com.

	•		An Audit Committee Charter, which requires, among other things, that the committee be comprised solely of independent directors (as set forth in the Independence Standards), at least one of ~~who~~whom will qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” as set forth in Item 401(h) of the SEC’s Regulation S-K. A copy of our Audit Committee Charter may be found on our Website,~~www.tylertech.com~~. www.tylertech.com.

	•		A Compensation Committee Charter, which requires, among other things, that the committee be comprised solely of independent directors and sets forth the guidelines for determining executive compensation. A copy of our Compensation Committee Charter may be found on our Website,~~www.tylertech.com~~.

	•		A Nominating and Governance Committee Charter, which requires, among other things, that the committee be comprised of at least three independent directors who are responsible for recommending candidates for www.tylertech.com.

910

~~election to the board of directors. A copy of our Nominating and Governance Committee Charter may be found on our Website,www.tylertech.com~~.

A Nominating and Governance Committee Charter, which requires, among other things, that the committee be comprised of at least three independent directors who are responsible for recommending candidates for election to the Board of Directors. A copy of our Nominating and Governance Committee Charter may be found on our Website, www.tylertech.com.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all of our directors, executive officers (including, without limitation, the chief executive officer, chief financial officer, principal accounting officer, and controller), and employees. The purpose of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is to promote:

	•		honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;

	•		full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in our public communications and reports filed with the SEC;

	•		compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules, and regulations;

	•		prompt internal reporting of violations of the policy to the appropriate persons designated therein, including anonymous “whistleblower” provisions; and

	•		accountability for adherence to the policy.

A copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics may be found on our Website,www.tylertech.com,, or will be furnished, without charge, upon written request at our principal executive offices. Any future amendments or waivers related to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics will be promptly posted on our Website.

Board Independence

Our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors has determined, after considering all of the relevant facts and circumstances, that each of the non-employee directors standing for re-election as director (Messrs. Brattain, King, Reeves, and Richards) has no material relationship with us (either directly or as a partner, shareholder, or officer of an organization that has a relationship with us) and is “independent” within the meaning of our Independence Standards described above and the New York Stock Exchange director independence standards, as currently in effect and as may be changed from time to time. As a result, if each of the nominees for director is elected at the annual meeting, our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors will be comprised of a majority of “independent” directors as required by the New York Stock Exchange. Furthermore, our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Governance Committee has no material relationship with us (either directly or as a partner, shareholder, or officer of an organization that has a relationship with us) and is “independent” within the meaning of our ~~director independence standards.~~Independence Standards.

Committees and Meetings of the Board of Directors

~~The board met~~Our Board of Directors has the following four ~~times during 2007.~~standing committees: Audit Committee; Compensation Committee; Nominating and Governance Committee; and Executive Committee. Each committee (other than the Executive Committee) has a written charter, which can be found at our Website, www.tylertech.com. Each board member participated in at least 75% of all board and committee meetings held during the portion of ~~2007~~2010 that he served as a director and/or committee member.

During 2010, our Board of Directors held four meetings. In addition, our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors has established a policy under which our non-management members will meet at regularly scheduled (and in any event at least twice per fiscal year) executive sessions without management present and with Mr. ~~G. Stuart~~ Reeves presiding over such meetings. ~~During 2007,~~

The table below provides current membership and 2010 meeting information for each of the ~~standing committees~~committees:


			Nominating and
Name	Audit	Compensation	Governance	Executive

Donald R. Brattain	Chairman		X
J. Luther King, Jr.	X	X
G. Stuart Reeves	X	X	Chairman
Michael D. Richards		Chairman	X
John S. Marr, Jr.				X
Dustin R. Womble				X
John M. Yeaman				Chairman

Total Meetings in 2010	Four	One	One	Periodically

Below is a description of each committee. Each committee has authority to engage legal counsel or other advisors or consultants as it deems appropriate to carry out its responsibilities.

Audit Committee.The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in its oversight of the quality and integrity of our ~~board of directors were the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Executive Committee,~~accounting, auditing, and ~~Nominating and Governance Committee.~~

~~Audit Committee.~~~~During 2007, the Audit Committee was comprised of Donald R. Brattain (Chairman), J. Luther King, Jr., and G. Stuart Reeves, each of whom is “independent” as defined above.~~reporting practices. The Audit Committee’s ~~duties include:~~role includes:

	•		considering the independence of our independent auditors before we engage them;

	•		reviewing with the independent auditors the fee, scope, and timing of the audit;

	•		reviewing the completed audit with the independent auditors regarding any significant accounting adjustments, recommendations for improving internal controls, appropriateness of accounting policies,

			appropriateness of accounting and disclosure decisions with respect to significant unusual transactions or material obligations, and significant findings during the audit;

	•		~~performance of~~performing periodic formal committee evaluations;

	•		reviewing our financial statements and related regulatory filings with management and the independent auditors; and

	•		meeting periodically with management and/or internal audit to discuss internal accounting and financial controls.

The Audit Committee ~~met five times during 2007.~~is responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of the independent auditor engaged to prepare or issue audit reports on our financial statements and internal control over financial reporting. The Committee relies on the expertise and knowledge of management and the independent auditor in carrying out its oversight responsibilities. The Board of Directors has determined that each Audit Committee member is a non-management director who satisfies our Independence Standards and has sufficient knowledge in financial and auditing matters to serve on the Audit Committee. In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Brattain and Mr. King are “audit committee financial experts” as defined by SEC rules.

Compensation Committee. ~~During 2007, the Compensation Committee was comprised of Michael D. Richards (Chairman), J. Luther King, Jr., and G. Stuart Reeves.~~ The Compensation Committee has ~~final authority on~~responsibility for defining and articulating our overall compensation philosophy and administering and approving all ~~executive~~elements of compensation for elected corporate officers, including base salary, annual cash incentive compensation, and ~~periodically reviews compensation and other benefits paid to or provided for our officers and directors.~~long-term equity incentive compensation. The Compensation Committee ~~also approves annual salaries~~reports to stockholders as required by the SEC. See “Compensation Discussion and ~~bonuses for executive officers to ensure that the recommended salaries and bonuses are not unreasonable. The~~Analysis — Compensation Committee ~~met twice during 2007.~~Report.” Members of the Compensation Committee are non-management directors who, in the opinion of the Board of Directors, satisfy our Independence Standards. For more information about the work of the Compensation Committee, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

~~Executive Committee~~. During 2007, the Executive Committee was comprised of John M. Yeaman (Chairman), John S. Marr, Jr., and Dustin R. Womble. The Executive Committee has the authority to act for the entire board of directors, but may not commit to an expenditure in excess of $5,000,000 without full board approval. The Executive Committee meets periodically throughout the year.

~~Nominating and Governance Committee.~~~~During 2007, the~~ Nominating and Governance Committee ~~was comprised of G. Stuart Reeves (Chairman), Donald R. Brattain, and Michael D. Richards.~~ .The Nominating and Governance Committee’s duties include:

	•		identifying and recommending candidates for election to our Board of Directors;

	•		identifying and recommending candidates to fill vacancies occurring between annual stockholder meetings;

	•		reviewing the composition of board ~~of directors;~~committees;

	•		periodically reviewing the appropriate skills and characteristics required of board members in the context of the current make-up of our ~~board;~~Board of Directors; and

	•		monitoring adherence to our “Corporate Governance ~~Guidelines”.~~Guidelines.”

Executive Committee. The Executive Committee has the authority to act for the entire Board of Directors, but may not commit to an expenditure in excess of $5,000,000 without full board approval.

Board Leadership Structure

The roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer are separate with Mr. Yeaman serving as Chairman of the Board and Mr. Marr serving as President and Chief Executive Officer. We believe it is beneficial to separate the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board to facilitate their differing roles in the leadership of Tyler. The role of the Chairman is to set the agenda for, and preside over, board meetings, as well as providing advice and assistance to the Chief Executive Officer. In contrast, the Chief Executive Officer is responsible for handling the day-to-day management direction of Tyler, serving as a leader to the management team, and formulating overall corporate strategy. Mr. Yeaman, as our Chairman and former Chief Executive Officer, brings over 11 years of experience within our industry as well as extensive expertise from outside Tyler, while Mr. Marr, as a director and our Chief Executive Officer, brings over 28 years of company-specific experience and expertise. We believe that this structure allows for a balanced corporate vision and an ability to effectively execute our strategy. The Board of Directors has concluded at this time that it is not necessary to establish a lead director.

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

Senior management is responsible for assessing and managing our various exposures to risk on a day-to-day basis, including the creation of appropriate risk management policies and programs. The Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing management in the execution of its responsibilities and for assessing our overall approach to risk management. The Board of Directors exercises these responsibilities periodically as part of its meetings and also through its three committees, each of which examines various components of enterprise risk as part of its responsibilities. The Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks relating to our executive compensation plans and arrangements. The Audit Committee oversees management of financial risks, as well as our policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management. The Nominating and Governance Committee ~~met once during 2007.~~manages risks associated with board independence and potential conflicts of interest. In addition, an overall review of risk is inherent in the Board’s consideration of our long-term strategies and in the transactions and other matters presented to the Board, including capital expenditures, acquisitions and divestitures, and financial matters. The Board of Directors’ role in risk oversight is consistent with our leadership structure, with the Chief Executive Officer and other members of senior management having responsibility for assessing and managing our risk exposure, and the Board and its committees providing oversight in connection with these efforts.

Audit Committee Financial Expert

Our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors determined that each of Donald R. Brattain and J. Luther King, Jr., current chairman and member of the Audit Committee, respectively, possesses the attributes necessary to qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” as set forth in Item 401(h) of the SEC’s Regulation S-K.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures for Audit and Non-Audit Services

The Audit Committee Charter requires that the Audit Committee pre-approve all of the audit and non-audit services performed by our independent auditors. The purpose of these pre-approval procedures is to ensure that the provision of services by our independent auditors does not impair their independence. Each year, the Audit Committee receives fee estimates from our independent auditors for each category of services to be performed by the independent auditors during the upcoming fiscal reporting year. These categories of services include Audit

Director Nominating Process

The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing and interviewing qualified candidates to serve on our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors and to select both “independent” as well as management nominees for director to be elected by our stockholders at each annual meeting. The Nominating and Governance Committee is comprised solely of independent directors and operates under a Charter for the Nominating and Governance Committee.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines include the criteria our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors believes are important in the selection of director ~~nominees, which includes the following qualifications:~~

	•		~~sound personal and professional integrity;~~

	•		~~an inquiring and independent mind;~~

	•		~~practical wisdom and mature judgment;~~

	•		~~broad training and experience at the policy-making level of business, finance and accounting, government, education, or technology;~~

	•		~~expertise that is useful to Tyler and complementary to the background and experience of other board members, so that an optimal balance of board members can be achieved and maintained;~~

	•		~~willingness to devote the required time to carrying out the duties and responsibilities of board membership;~~

	•		~~commitment to serve on the board for several years to develop knowledge about our business;~~

	•		~~willingness to represent the best interests of all stockholders and objectively appraise management performance; and~~

	•		~~involvement only in activities or interests that do not conflict with the director’s responsibilities to Tyler or our stockholders.~~

nominees. For more information about director nominee criteria and qualifications, see “Tyler Management — Board Diversity and Nominee Qualifications.”

The Nominating and Governance Committee may, in the exercise of its discretion, actively solicit nominee candidates; however, nominee recommendations submitted by other directors or stockholders will also be considered as described below.

The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider qualified nominees recommended by stockholders who may submit recommendations to the committee in care of our Corporate Secretary at our corporate headquarters, 5949 Sherry Lane, Suite 1400, Dallas, Texas 75225. To be considered by the Nominating and Governance Committee, stockholder nominations must be submitted in accordance with our bylaws and must be accompanied by a description of the qualifications of the proposed candidate and a written statement from the proposed candidate that he or she is willing to be nominated and desires to serve, if elected. Nominees for director who are recommended by our stockholders will be evaluated in the same manner as any other nominee for director.

Nominations by stockholders may also be made at an annual meeting of stockholders in the manner provided in our bylaws. Our bylaws require that a stockholder entitled to vote for the election of directors may make nominations of persons for election to our board at a meeting of stockholders by complying with required notice procedures. Nominations must be received at our corporate headquarters not less than 75 days or more than 85 days before any annual meeting of stockholders. If, however, notice or prior public disclosure of an annual meeting is given or made less than 75 days before the date of the annual meeting, the notice must be received no later than the 10^th day following the date of mailing of the notice of annual meeting or the date of public disclosure of the date of the annual meeting, whichever is earlier. The notice must specify the following:

as to each person the stockholder proposes to nominate for election or re-election as a director:

	•		the name, age, business address, and residence address of the person;

	•		the principal occupation or employment of the person;

	•		the class and number of shares of our capital stock that are beneficially owned by the person; and

	•		any other information relating to the person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations for proxies for election of directors under Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act; and

as to the stockholder giving notice:

We may require that the proposed nominee furnish us with other information as we may reasonably request to assist us in determining the eligibility of the proposed nominee to serve as a director. At any meeting of stockholders, the presiding officer may disregard the purported nomination of any person not made in compliance with these procedures.

Communications with Our Board of Directors

Any stockholder or interested party who wishes to communicate with our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors or any specific directors, including non-management directors may write to:

Board of Directors
Tyler Technologies, Inc.
5949 Sherry Lane, Suite 1400
Dallas, Texas 75225

Depending on the subject matter, management will:

	•		forward the communication to the director or directors to whom it is addressed (for example, if the communication received deals with our “whistleblower policy” found on our Website,www.tylertech.com,, including questions, concerns, or complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, and auditing matters, it will be forwarded by management to the Chairman of the Audit Committee for review);

	•		attempt to handle the inquiry directly (for example, if the communication is a request for information about us or our operations or it is a stock-related matter that does not appear to require direct attention by our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors)~~Directors); or

	•		not forward the communication if it is primarily commercial in nature or if it relates to an improper or irrelevant topic.

At each meeting of our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors,~~Directors, our Chairman will present a summary of all communications received since the last meeting of the ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors that were not forwarded and will make those communications available to any director on request.

Director Attendance at Annual Meetings

Directors are not required to attend our annual meetings of stockholders. However, our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors typically holds a meeting immediately following the annual meeting of stockholders. Therefore, in most cases, all of our directors will be present at the annual meeting. All of our directors were present at the ~~2007~~2010 annual meeting of stockholders.

1315

SECURITIES OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March ~~17, 2008~~18, 2011 by (i) each beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock, (ii) each director and nominee, (iii) each “Named Executive Officer” (as defined in the SEC’s Regulation S-K), and (iv) all of our executive officers and directors as a group.

Security Ownership of Directors and Management


				Options													Options
				Exercisable													Exercisable
				Within 60							Percent						Within 60							Percent
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1)	Direct (2)			Days (3)		Other (4)			Total		of Class (5)			Direct (2)			Days (3)		Other (4)			Total		of Class (5)
Brown Brothers Harriman and Company 140 Broadway New York City, NY 10005															—			—		3,535,013	(6)		3,535,013		11.0	%

MSD Capital, L.P. 645 Fifth Avenue, 21st Floor New York, NY 10022		4,049,923	(6)		—		—			4,049,923		10.7	%
MSD Capital, L.P.															—			—		2,527,423	(7)		2,527,423		7.9	%
645 Fifth Avenue, 21st Floor New York, NY 10022

Noonday Asset Management LP 227 West Trade Street, Suite 2140 Charlotte, NC 28202		3,801,400	(7)		—		—			3,801,400		10.0	%
Brown Capital Management, Inc.															2,452,668	(8)		—		—			2,452,668		7.7	%
1201 N. Calvert Street Baltimore, MD 21202

Brown Brothers Harriman and Company		2,980,100	(8)		—		—			2,980,100		7.9	%
140 Broadway New York City, NY 10005
BlackRock, Inc.															2,216,203	(9)		—		—			2,216,203		6.9	%
40 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10022

Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC															2,132,400	(10)		—		—			2,132,400		6.7	%
227 West Monroe Street, Suite 3000 Chicago, IL 60606

Directors and Nominees

Donald R. Brattain		28,500			25,000		—			53,500		*			28,500			44,999		—			73,499		*
J. Luther King, Jr.		32,000			25,000		187,300	(9)		244,300		*			32,000			44,999		187,300	(11)		264,299		*
G. Stuart Reeves		65,000			115,000		—			180,000		*			20,000			114,999		—			134,999		*
Michael D. Richards		40,000			35,000		—			75,000		*			40,000			54,999		—			94,999		*
John M. Yeaman		184,350			566,950		7,300	(10)		758,600		2.0	%		280,132			384,268		7,300	(12)		671,700		2.1	%

Named Executive Officers

John S. Marr, Jr.		1,206,699			446,000		192,277	(11)		1,844,976		4.8	%		622,092			636,000		192,277	(13)		1,450,369		4.4	%
Dustin R. Womble		171,995			248,628		—			420,623		1.1	%		177,450			553,628		—			731,078		2.2	%
Brian K. Miller		23,072			75,000		7,300	(12)		105,372		*			26,347			198,188		7,300	(14)		231,835		*
H. Lynn Moore, Jr.		66,667			68,333		—			135,000		*			50,000			224,000		—			274,000		*

All directors, nominees and executive officers as a group (9 persons)		1,818,283			1,604,911		394,177			3,817,371		9.6	%		1,276,521			2,256,080		394,177			3,926,778		11.4	%


(5)		Based on ~~37,981,782~~32,051,000 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding at March ~~17, 2008.~~18, 2011. Each stockholder’s percentage is calculated by dividing (a) the number of shares beneficially owned by (b) the sum of (i) ~~37,981,782~~32,051,000 plus (ii) the number of shares such owner has the right to acquire within ~~sixty~~60 days.

(6)		Based on information reported by ~~MSD Capital, L.P.~~Brown Brothers Harriman and Company on aan Amendment to Schedule 13G that was filed with the SEC on or about February ~~3, 2006.~~11, 2010. Brown Brothers Harriman and Company is deemed to have beneficial ownership of these shares, which includes shared voting and investment power for all 3,535,013 shares.

(7)		Based on information reported by ~~Noonday Asset Management,~~MSD Capital, L.P. on aAmendment No. 2 to Schedule 13G that was filed with the SEC on or about ~~January 29, 2008.~~February 14, 2011. MSD Capital, L.P. is deemed to have beneficial ownership of these shares, which includes shared voting and investment power for all 2,527,423 shares.

(8)		Based on information reported by Brown ~~Brothers Harriman and Company~~Capital Management, Inc. on aAmendment No. 3 to Schedule 13G that was filed with the SEC on or about February 7, ~~2008.~~2011. Brown Capital Management, Inc. is deemed to have beneficial ownership of these shares, which includes sole voting power of 1,319,416 shares and sole investment power for all 2,452,668 shares.

(9)		Based on information reported by BlackRock, Inc. on Amendment No. 1 to Schedule 13G that was filed on or about February 9, 2011. BlackRock, Inc. is deemed to have beneficial ownership of these shares, which includes sole voting and sole investment power for all 2,216,203 shares.

(10)		Based on information reported by Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC on a Schedule 13G that was filed on or about February 11, 2011. Columbia Wanger is deemed to have beneficial ownership of these shares, which includes sole voting power of 2,044,400 shares and sole investment power for all 2,132,400 shares.

(11)		Includes the beneficial ownership of ~~(a)~~ 180,000 shares of common stock held in an ~~investment partnership~~entity controlled by Mr. King in which ~~Mr. King is the general partner and~~he is deemed to have voting and investment power, and ~~(b)~~ 7,300 shares of common stock owned by a foundation in which Mr. King is deemed to have shared voting power.

~~(10)~~(12)		Common stock owned by a foundation in which Mr. Yeaman is deemed to have shared voting power.

~~(11)~~(13)		Common stock held by a partnership in which Mr. Marr is the general partner and has sole voting and investment power.

~~(12)~~(14)		Common stock owned by a foundation in which Mr. Miller is deemed to have shared voting power.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act requires that our directors, executive officers, and 10% or more stockholders file with the SEC and New York Stock Exchange initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock. These persons are required to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file with the SEC. To our knowledge, based solely upon (i) our review of the copies of the forms we received during ~~2007~~2010 and (ii) written representations from our directors and executive officers we believe that all of our directors, officers, and 10% or more stockholders complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements during 2007 except for one transaction subsequently reported on an amended Form 4. Mr. Marr inadvertently did not file a Form 4 in a timely manner with respect to a gift of 5,000 shares of our common stock to a charitable gift fund.2010.

1517

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

In this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, we describe our compensation objectives, policies, and practices generally and the specific fiscal year 2010 total compensation for our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and the two other executive officers who were the most highly compensated in fiscal year 2010 (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”), and we summarize the approved compensation of the Named Executive Officers for fiscal year 2011.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

Our Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving the design and administration of the executive compensation program. Our Compensation Committee believes that an effective compensation program should reward achievement of specific corporate goals and align our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders by rewarding performance that meets or exceeds established goals. Our compensation philosophy is designed to attract, motivate, and retain the key executives who drive our success and industry leadership and to motivate those executives to deliver stockholder value by achieving the following overall objectives:

	•		Compensation Should Align the Interests of Our Executives with Our Stockholders — compensation should link the interests of management with those of stockholders by making a substantial portion of executive compensation depend upon our long-term financial and stock performance;

	•		Compensation Should Be Competitive— compensation levels should be sufficiently competitive to attract and retain superior executives by providing them with the opportunity to earn total compensation packages that are competitive in the industry;

	•		Compensation Should Be Based on Company Performance— compensation should reward corporate performance through annual cash incentives;

	•		Compensation Should Reflect Responsibility and Accountability— compensation should be based on the level of skill, knowledge, effort, and responsibility needed to perform the job successfully; and

	•		Compensation Should Not Incentivize Excessive Risk Taking— the mix of compensation elements should be appropriately balanced between fixed pay, short-term annual incentive cash compensation, and long-term incentive equity compensation to minimize incentive for excessive risk taking.

To achieve these objectives, the Compensation Committee has designed a compensation program for our Named Executive Officers that balances the three primary elements of our executive compensation: annual base pay; annual incentive cash compensation; and long-term incentive equity compensation (stock options). The Compensation Committee believes that this structure encourages our executives to think and act in both the near-term and long-term interests of our stockholders without promoting excessive risk taking.

Regarding base pay and annual cash incentive compensation, the same compensation philosophy applied by the Compensation Committee to our Named Executive Officers is also utilized by management and applied throughout the entire employee base so that all employees’ incentive compensation is tied to similar goals, the difference being the amount of base pay compensation and percentage incentive compensation award in relation to base pay. Regarding long-term incentive compensation in the form of stock options, management also applies the same compensation philosophy as applied by the Compensation Committee to our Named Executive Officers to senior divisional employees. We believe that the application of this consistent philosophy regarding compensation further strengthens the alignment of employees’ interests with those of the stockholders.

2010 Executive Summary Overview

2010 was a difficult year in light of the overall challenging economic environment. Total revenues declined from $290 million to $289 million. Declines in software license and software services revenues from 2009 levels were largely offset by strong growth in recurring revenues from subscriptions, which rose 36%, and maintenance, which grew 9%, compared to 2009. Earnings per share declined from $0.74 in 2009 to $0.71 in 2010. Free cash flow (excluding $1.3 million of office facility investments) remained strong at $32 million. We maintained a strong balance sheet with low debt levels at December 31, 2010. Our stock price appreciated 4% from December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2010.

Compensation Program Actions

Our compensation program for our Named Executive Officers has three components:

	•		Compensation Program Design — actions related to the overall design and governance of our executive compensation program;

	•		Company Performance Review Process for Prior Fiscal Year — actions approving actual incentive cash compensation awards for the just-completed fiscal year; and

	•		Setting Compensation for Current Fiscal Year — actions that set future base pay and incentive compensation targets for the upcoming fiscal year.

Compensation Program Design. Each year, our Chief Executive Officer, in conjunction with the Human Resources Department, reviews the market competitiveness of our executive compensation relative to technology and broad industry peers, which is described in detail below. If the review shows that our executive compensation is not competitive, our Chief Executive Officer will recommend changes to the Compensation Committee. He may also recommend changes to the executive compensation program based on changes in the business environment in which we operate. The ~~primary~~Compensation Committee periodically reviews the overall objectives of our executive compensation program and the elements of the program, including the mix of cash and stock-based compensation and the mix of short-term and long-term compensation, to determine whether they are appropriate, properly coordinated, and achieve their intended purposes.

Peer Group and Surveys. Prior to September 2010, the Compensation Committee considered comparative market data from a broad set of companies in the Culpepper Executive Compensation Surveys (the “Culpepper Surveys”). Over 1,500 technology and biomedical companies use Culpepper Surveys to benchmark their compensation practices for all levels within their organizations. In September of 2010, we terminated our subscription to the Culpepper Survey and joined the Radford Global Technology Survey (the “Radford Survey”). Nearly 2,000 technology and life science companies use Radford Surveys to benchmark their compensation practices for all levels within their organizations. Management utilizes the Radford Survey to determine the reasonableness of compensation for various levels of employees, including executives. Both surveys are industry leaders, but the Radford survey allows us to access more complete compensation data for division level management positions. In February 2011, the Compensation Committee considered comparative market data from a broad set of technology companies in the Radford Survey.

In order to provide the Compensation Committee with more detailed and specific information about executive compensation levels and practices, we established a peer group of 20 companies of similar size in the software industry (the “Peer Group”) in February 2011 to assist in determining 2011 compensation. The Peer Group companies provide perspective and reflect the external market’s valuation of key executive compensation. External information is considered with internal factors such as an executive’s position, experience, and responsibilities. The Peer Group will be reviewed annually and adjusted as required by changes in the market. The companies in the Peer Group used to assist in setting 2011 compensation were:


Ariba, Inc.		Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
Aspen Technology, Inc.		JDA Software Group, Inc.
Blackbaud, Inc.		Kenexa Corp.
Blackboard, Inc.		Lawson Software, Inc.
Concur Technologies, Inc.		Manhattan Associates, Inc.
DealerTrack Holdings, Inc.		Netscout Systems, Inc.
Deltek, Inc.		Quest Software, Inc.
Eclipsys Corp.		Radiant Systems, Inc.
Epicor Software Corp.		S1 Corp.
Epiq Systems, Inc.		Taleo Corp.

In determining the appropriateness of the Peer Group, the Compensation Committee compared our performance against six key metrics of the Peer Group, including revenues, market capitalization, net income, total assets, one-year stockholder return and three-year stockholder return. The Compensation Committee determined that based on these metrics the Peer Group was appropriate for comparative purposes. The Peer Group was the same as that used in 2010 compensation decisions. The Compensation Committee continues to utilize the Radford Survey in addition to the Peer Group. The Compensation Committee uses market survey data like the Peer Group and Radford Survey not as a benchmark per se, but rather as a reasonableness check. This flexibility is important in designing compensation arrangements to attract and ~~employ outstanding management~~retain new executives in ~~order~~the highly-competitive, rapidly changing market in which we compete.

Positioning of Pay. The Compensation Committee determines target total compensation for our Named Executive Officers after considering the Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations and a variety of data sources, including analysis of the Peer Group and Radford Survey. We do not apply a formula that ties our total compensation levels to ~~obtain outstanding results,~~specific market percentiles.

Mix of Pay Elements. As described above, our philosophy is to provide a ~~strong link between~~significant portion of total compensation linked to performance that we believe will create long-term stockholder value. To achieve these objectives, the executive compensation program relies on the following three elements of total compensation:


	Form of
Element	Compensation	Purpose	Metric
Base salary	Cash	Provide competitive, fixed compensation to attract and retain exceptional executive talent	Salaries are set each year based on the executive’s position, responsibilities, experience, and retention risk. Base salary is a fixed component and is not dependent on achieving goals.

Incentive cash compensation under the annual bonus plan	Cash	Create a strong financial incentive for achieving or exceeding annual financial performance goals	Achieving earnings per share goals (as may be adjusted to the extent we exceed our recurring revenue run rate growth goal), which are recommended by the CEO and approved by the Compensation Committee

Equity-based compensation	Stock options	Create a strong financial incentive for creating stockholder value, encourage a significant equity stake in Tyler, and provide a direct incentive for future performance	Discretionary, but set each year based on the executive’s position, experience, responsibilities, and retention risk

Our executive compensation program is designed to provide an incentive and ~~long-term cash and stock incentives to~~reward for the achievement of both short-term and long-term objectives. We believe that sustained achievement of measurable ~~corporate performance~~financial objectives ~~and~~leads to ~~align executive incentives with~~increased stockholder value. To ~~attract and retain high-level individuals,~~achieve these objectives we may pay above-median compensation or provide stock ownership and stock option incentives to our executive officers. Our Compensation Committee has the responsibility for final approval for all compensation to our executive officers and directors, including the duty to ensure that compensation paid to executive officers does not exceed reasonable amounts and is based on objective standards. The Compensation Committee approves or disapproves the recommendations of management regarding compensation according to the guidelines set forth below. The specific duties and responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are set forth in the Compensation Committee Charter.

We use a mix of short-term compensation (base salaries and annual cash bonuses) and long-term ~~compensation~~incentives (stock options) to provide a total compensation structure that is designed to reward ~~outstanding~~sustained strong performance ~~and provide~~while providing cash ~~incentives at or slightly above the median~~compensation that remains competitive for our industry. ~~From time~~In setting the mix between the different elements of compensation, we do not target specific allocations, but generally weigh the incentive compensation elements (cash and equity) more heavily. For more information, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — 2010 Named Executive Officer Compensation — Compensation Mix.”

Base salary is intended to ~~time, salaries, bonuses,~~provide competitive, fixed compensation to attract and retain exceptional executive talent. Annual incentives are intended to reward the achievement of short-term objectives, with a view to long-term stockholder value. Our 2011 incentive compensation plan is based on annual earnings per share performance metrics (as may be adjusted to the extent we exceed our year-over-year recurring revenue run rate growth goal) and is structured with graduated benefits for overachievement and consequences for underachievement of objectives. Growth in our recurring revenue run rate is a new component of executive incentive compensation for 2011. We believe that growth in our recurring revenues (e.g., software maintenance and subscription-based arrangements) builds long-term financial stability and drives long-term stockholder value; however, due to software revenue recognition rules, growth in our recurring revenue run rate may not necessarily be reflected in a given year’s annual earnings per share performance. Given the long-term stockholder value of increasing our recurring revenues, we do not believe that an annual incentive plan should create any bias towards traditional software license sales versus the sale of or conversion to subscription-based arrangements. Therefore, adjusting our earnings per share to the extent we exceed our recurring revenue run rate growth goal in calculating incentive compensation better aligns management and stockholder short-term and long-term interests and provides a more meaningful measure than growth in earnings per share alone. While our annual incentive compensation plan is based on a given year’s earnings per share (as may be adjusted to the extent we exceed our recurring revenue run rate growth goal), the initial establishment of the criteria for full achievement of the target bonus from year to year is based on a longer term view of appropriate growth. In other words, performance that meets our internal plan in a given year may not

necessarily correspond with our executives earning 100% of the target bonus, if the internal plan does not meet the goal of overall year-over-year growth. For more information on the calculation of 2011 incentive compensation, including the calculation of the adjustment, if any, for growth in our year-over-year recurring revenue run rate, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — 2011 Named Executive Officer Compensation — 2011 Compensation Committee / Board of Director Actions.”

Equity incentives, comprised of stock options, are intended to reward sustained achievement of long-term objectives through time-based vesting periods. Stock options to our executive officers have a ten-year life and, beginning in 2010, vest ratably over a period of four years beginning on the third anniversary of the date of grant, thereby providing a long-term incentive. Our allocations reflect our philosophy that a significant portion of our executive officers’ compensation should be performance-based and therefore at risk depending on Tyler’s performance. Through the use of stock options, a significant portion of potential compensation is tied directly to stock price appreciation, further aligning the interest of our executive officers ~~are evaluated by reference to nationwide comparisons. A substantial portion of each~~with those of our ~~executive officer’s potential total~~stockholders. We have considered other forms of equity compensation, ~~is in~~such as restricted stock, but believe that stock options are the best form of ~~bonuses~~equity based compensation as stock options only reward executives if the value of the stock increases. Restricted stock can provide additional compensation even if the stock value is stagnant. All stock option awards are granted in semi-annual tranches (on or about June 15 and ~~options. Annual bonuses vary significantly based on our financial results,~~December 15). Stock option awards are made at the ~~achievement~~market price at the time of ~~strategic objectives, extraordinary individual achievement, and each individual’s contribution toward our performance.~~

~~Executive Compensation Components~~the award.

Our ~~compensation program consists of:~~philosophy with regard to granting stock options is to:

	•		~~base salary;~~strive to ensure that the overall number and value of stock option awards is reasonable;

	•		~~annual cash bonus program;~~focus stock option awards on a relatively small number of key employees determined to have a direct impact on our ability to achieve our long-term goals with the largest stock option grants awarded to our top performers and individuals with the greatest responsibilities and the potential to drive long-term share price appreciation; and

	•		~~long-term incentive awards in~~manage the ~~form~~overall net stock dilution (i.e., manage the total number of shares outstanding by balancing the dilutive effect of granting stock ~~options.~~options with repurchases of our common stock, which reduce our shares outstanding).

Assessment of Risk. Our compensation program is designed not to incentivize excessive risk taking by allocating an appropriate balance between the three compensation elements. The base salary component of compensation is a fixed amount and is therefore not subject to or influenced by risk taking. Our annual cash incentive compensation is principally focused on short-term performance with consideration given to long-term stockholder value (earnings per share, as may be adjusted to the extent we exceed our recurring revenue run rate growth goal). Our long-term incentive compensation is based on long-term stock price growth through the grant of stock options. Our annual cash incentive compensation plans are graduated scale plans rather than based on “all or nothing” performance, which reduces the incentive for short-term excessive risk taking. Moreover, our stock option grants occur in fixed amounts on a semi-annual basis (on or about June 15 and December 15), which reduces or eliminates the ability of executive officers to time the grant of options around short-term, market events. Further, options granted to Named Executive Officers vest at 25% per year on the third through sixth anniversary of the date of grant, which further emphasizes the long-term nature of this compensation component and reduces the incentive for risk taking. Finally, the Board of Directors adopted the Executive Compensation Recovery Policy effective January 1, 2010, which provides that the independent directors can direct Tyler to recover all or a portion of any bonus or incentive compensation paid to an executive if, in the opinion of the independent directors, an executive engages in fraud or intentional misconduct that causes a material restatement of our financial statements. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — 2011 Named Executive Officer Compensation.”

~~Base Salary~~

~~Base salary is established~~Company Performance Review Process for Prior Fiscal Year. Each year, the Compensation Committee approves the size of incentive compensation for the prior fiscal year based on ~~each executive officer’s experience, skill, knowledge, and responsibilities, referring also to market data. The~~the achievement of defined incentive compensation plans that were approved by the Compensation Committee ~~approved base salaries for 2007 after considering a number~~at the beginning of ~~factors, including:~~

	•		~~individual performance of~~the year. Annual bonuses are reviewed by the ~~executive;~~

	•		~~internal review of the executive’s compensation, both individually and relative to other officers;~~

	•		~~the base salary of each executive officer in prior years; and~~

	•		~~market data of base salary information.~~

~~The~~ Compensation Committee ~~does not assign relative weight or rankings to these factors, but instead makes a subjective determination based upon~~and paid shortly after the ~~consideration of all of these factors. Salary levels~~fiscal year’s financial results are ~~typically considered annually as part of our performance review process as well as upon a promotion or other change in job responsibility.~~approved by the Audit Committee.

1622

While the payment of annual incentive compensation is based solely on the achievement of pre-defined and pre-approved metrics, the Compensation Committee, using its judgment, may exercise discretion in granting additional bonus amounts and stock option awards as it deems appropriate. These adjustments may be based on subjective factors such as the Compensation Committee’s assessment of external factors, including general economic and market conditions, unforeseen “one-time” events affecting financial performance or driving stockholder value, the executive’s assumption of additional responsibilities, the degree of difficulty of a particular assignment, and the executive’s experience, tenure, and future prospects with Tyler.

Setting Compensation for Current Fiscal Year. Each year, the Compensation Committee approves base salary, annual incentive compensation earnings per share plans and the amount of stock options to be granted to the Named Executive Officers as part of our semi-annual option grants. In so doing, the Committee reviews recommendations by the Chief Executive Officer and analyzes the Peer Group and Radford Survey, internal business plans, and general economic conditions. For more information on the establishment of 2010 Named Executive Officer compensation, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — 2010 Named Executive Officer Compensation.”

2010 Named Executive Officer Compensation

In February 2010, the Compensation Committee approved the total 2010 compensation packages for each of the Named Executive Officers, including the Chief Executive Officer. The total compensation packages included base salary, an annual cash incentive compensation plan, and proposed stock option grants. The Compensation Committee re-affirmed the appropriateness and amount of stock option grants prior to the June 15 and December 15 awards. In February 2011, the Compensation Committee conducted a Company performance review to determine the attainment of earnings per share targets, relating to the payment of cash incentive bonus under the incentive compensation plan for 2010.

Role of the Chief Executive Officer. In February 2010, our Chief Executive Officer, John S. Marr, Jr., provided the Compensation Committee with recommendations for 2010 base salary increases, annual bonus performance targets with related minimum and maximum bonus payout potentials, and long-term incentives (stock option awards) for each Named Executive Officer, including himself. His recommendations were based on market compensation survey data consisting of the Peer Group and the Culpepper Surveys provided by our Human Resources Department, as well as his review of internal pay relationships and consistency, the executive’s performance and experience, level of responsibility, changes in responsibilities, and retention risk. The Compensation Committee reviewed the Peer Group and the Culpepper Surveys in detail and determined that the Peer Group was an appropriate group for comparative purposes. Cash bonus payout potentials were based on the level of earnings per share achieved compared to earnings per share goals developed in connection with our annual operating plan at the beginning of 2010. Payouts were graduated for above and below target performance levels.

Analysis of Compensation Elements. The principal elements of our executive compensation program in 2010 were (1) base salary, (2) annual cash bonus, and (3) stock options, each of which is described in more detail below:

Base Salary. Base salary represents the single, fixed component of the three principal elements of our executive compensation program and is intended to provide a baseline minimum amount of annual compensation for our executives. In February 2010, the Compensation Committee approved a 3% increase for each of the Named Executive Officer’s annual base salary as set forth below:


Name	Increase			2009 Salary		2010 Salary
John S. Marr, Jr.		3	%	$	407,000	$	420,000
Dustin R. Womble		3	%	$	343,000	$	353,000
Brian K. Miller		3	%	$	257,500	$	265,000
H. Lynn Moore, Jr.		3	%	$	257,500	$	265,000

The 3% increase in base salary was recommended to the Compensation Committee by the Chief Executive Officer. His recommendations were based on two things. First, he referenced nationwide market survey information from the Peer Group and the Culpepper Surveys. This information included comparisons to similar-sized companies that were public companies in the technology and life sciences industries with annual revenues between $200 million and $500 million. The survey indicated that the base salary for our Named Executive Officers

was below the average base salary reflected in the Peer Group and Culpepper Surveys, while the incentive target percentages were at or above the 50^th percentile. Second, and most important, he believed that it was appropriate to treat executive management on a consistent basis with the overall employee base, which received an average 3% merit increase in 2010.

The Compensation Committee reviewed the nationwide market survey information in a summary report and considered current economic conditions and the Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations in independently determining the 2010 salary adjustments. As noted above, the Compensation Committee does not adhere to strict formulas or rely to any significant extent on market survey data to determine total compensation or the mix of compensation elements. Market survey data is not used as a benchmark per se, but rather is referred to by the Compensation Committee as a reasonableness check.

Annual Cash Bonus ~~Program~~

. A significant portion of ~~the~~each executive’s annual compensation is in the form of a cash bonus. We believe that some meaningful portion of the executive’s compensation should be contingent upon the successful achievement of our corporate objectives. ~~Therefore, 2007~~Our 2010 annual cash bonuses for executives ~~are~~were based on the level of attainment of ~~certain corporate~~earnings per share objectives and did not include any individual performance goals. In February 2010, the Compensation Committee approved the 2010 Incentive Compensation Plan recommended by ~~management and approved by~~ the ~~compensation committee.~~

Awards of annual bonuses are based upon targets and maximum bonus payouts set by the compensation committee and approved by the board of directors at the beginning of each fiscal year. The performance period for cash bonuses is the calendar year, and payouts are made in February and March following the plan year. Target bonus, as a percentage of base salary, is setChief Executive Officer, which was based on ~~each executive’s position within~~ the organization as well as the executive’s overall compensation package. In addition, the compensation committee may exercise discretion and take into account individual performance in determining awards.

~~The named executive officers participate in a bonus plan that is based on actual~~achievement of fully diluted earnings per share ~~(“EPS”) compared~~goals established in connection with our annual operating plan and consistent with our long-term growth strategy. The Board of Directors also reviews the annual operating plan. The 2010 Incentive Compensation Plan for the Named Executive Officers was similar to ~~budgeted fully diluted EPS (“EPS Bonus Plan”). The EPS Bonus Plan is calculated as a~~other corporate employees’ incentive compensation plans and tied to similar goals, the main difference being the size of the target incentive award in relation to base salary. We believe that the percentage of compensation that is based on our performance should increase with an employee’s level within Tyler up to and including executive management. Target incentives are determined based on experience, level of responsibility, and retention risk. The 2010 Incentive Compensation Plan provided the ~~executive’s base salary, with higher ranked~~opportunity for the executive officers ~~being compensated~~as well as our corporate employees to earn incentive compensation at ~~a higher percentage~~the following levels:

	•		180% of target based on achieving 129% of earnings per share goal

	•		170% of target based on achieving 125% of earnings per share goal

	•		160% of target based on achieving 121% of earnings per share goal

	•		150% of target based on achieving 118% of earnings per share goal

	•		140% of target based on achieving 114% of earnings per share goal

	•		130% of target based on achieving 111% of earnings per share goal

	•		120% of target based on achieving 107% of earnings per share goal

	•		110% of target based on achieving 104% of earnings per share goal

	•		100% of target based on achieving 100% of earnings per share goal

	•		90% of target based on achieving 96% of earnings per share goal

	•		80% of target based on achieving 93% of earnings per share goal

	•		70% of target based on achieving 89% of earnings per share goal

	•		60% of target based on achieving 86% of earnings per share goal

	•		50% of target based on achieving 82% of earnings per share goal

	•		40% of target based on achieving 79% of earnings per share goal

	•		0% of target based on achieving less than 78% of earnings per share goal

In order to earn 100% of ~~base salary. Based on~~ the ~~recommendations of management, the compensation committee set~~ target bonus for 2010, we had to achieve the earnings per share goal of $0.84 to $0.869, which was slightly higher than our operating plan that formed the basis of our published earnings guidance, but was generally in a range consistent with our long-term growth strategy. In other words, we had to exceed our internal operating plan in order for participants to achieve 100% of the target incentive bonus. In order to achieve the threshold bonus of 40% of target, we had to achieve 79% of the earnings per share goal, a range of $0.66 to $0.689. The operating plan is developed from the “bottom-up” and considers a wide range of factors that impact our results, including the general economic environment, our market, competitive landscape, initiatives and investments, and various other risks and opportunities. As of the beginning of the plan year, achievement of the plan was generally considered to be challenging but reasonably possible when all such factors were considered.

The Compensation Committee approved target incentive awards for ~~2007~~2010 at 100% of base salary for Mr. Marr and Mr. Womble, and ~~50%~~75% of base salary for Mr. Miller and Mr. Moore. The ~~minimum payout~~difference is primarily based on the executives’ level ~~under~~of responsibility and retention risk. For 2010, we achieved earnings per share of $0.71. Accordingly, in February 2011, the ~~2007 EPS Bonus Plan was 0%~~Compensation Committee approved an annual cash bonus of 50% of the target incentive award, which was consistent with the 2010 Incentive Compensation Plan approved by the Compensation Committee in February 2010. The Compensation Committee did not grant any additional bonus ~~while the maximum payout level was 170%~~compensation to any of the ~~target bonus.~~Named Executive Officers for 2010.

Stock Options. A third component to our Named Executive Officers’ 2010 compensation is stock options. As discussed above, stock options promote long-term performance and serve as a means of attracting, motivating, and retaining executive officers. Stock options also provide a vital link between the long-term results achieved for our stockholders and the rewards provided to executive officers and other key employees. Option holders only realize value on stock options if our stock price increases and only if they remain employed with us beyond the date their options vest. When our stock price does not grow, our executives realize little value from this component of their compensation. We believe this is appropriate because our stockholders also would not have benefited significantly from owning our stock.

In February 2010, our Chief Executive Officer recommended stock option grants for our Named Executive Officers. He recommended these grants be made in two equal tranches on June 15 and December 15, which was consistent with our semi-annual grant policy. The 2010 option grants vest at 25% on the third through sixth anniversary of the date of grant and have an exercise price equal to fair market value of our common stock on the grant date. The term and vesting period for stock option grants was consistent with stock option grants made to all our employees.

In February 2010, the Compensation Committee preliminarily approved the size of option grants to our Named Executive Officers, which included a 20% increase in the number of shares from 2009 option grants. In so doing, the Compensation Committee considered many factors, including the fact that our Named Executive Officers’ total compensation is below the average as reflected in the Peer Group and Culpepper Surveys, the recommendation of our Chief Executive Officer, our potential future financial performance, each Named Executive Officer’s experience and level of responsibility, and our retention risk for each Named Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee does not have a set formula by which it determines which of these factors is more or less important, and the specific factors used and their weighting may vary among individual executives. The Compensation Committee also periodically reviews Risk Metrics Group guidelines as to the appropriate level of stock option awards granted for companies of similar characteristics. Prior to June 15 and December 15, 2010, the Compensation Committee approved the actual grants of stock options to each Named Executive Officer as set forth below:


Name	2009		2010
John S. Marr, Jr.		60,000		72,000
Dustin R. Womble		50,000		60,000
Brian K. Miller		40,000		48,000
H. Lynn Moore, Jr.		40,000		48,000

Stock option awards are made annually to approximately 2—4% of all employees. The Named Executive Officers were awarded approximately 30% of the total annual recurring stock options granted to employees in 2010 as part of our annual recurring stock option grant program. In 2010, the percentage of total stock option awards for our annually recurring grants to Named Executive Officers was as follows:


	Percentage of total
	annually recurring
Name	stock option awards
John S. Marr, Jr.		10	%
Dustin R. Womble		8	%
Brian K. Miller		6	%
H. Lynn Moore, Jr.		6	%

Compensation Mix. The mix of the three key elements of 2010 Named Executive Officer compensation is designed with the objective of putting a substantial portion of executive pay at risk. While salaries are intended to be assured, the other two elements only have value if earnings per share goals are met and if the value of our common stock increases. We believe that having a larger measure of key pay elements at risk motivates and challenges our Named Executive Officers to achieve positive returns for our stockholders. For 2010, the proportion of pay at risk for our Named Executive Officers was as follows:


				Compensation at risk
Name	Base Salary			Bonus			Stock Options
John S. Marr, Jr.		35	%		18	%		47	%
Dustin R. Womble		35	%		18	%		47	%
Brian K. Miller		36	%		14	%		50	%
H. Lynn Moore, Jr.		36	%		14	%		50	%

The table above depicts the relative mix of pay elements for 2010, made up of base salary earned, annual bonus cash incentive earned in 2010 (paid in 2011), and the aggregate grant date fair value of stock option grants made to the executive officers. See “Executive Compensation — Summary Compensation Table” for more detail.

Additional Considerations. In addition ~~100%~~to the general philosophies and specific considerations discussed above, the Compensation Committee discussed in detail the following in determining total compensation for the Named Executive Officers:

	•		our 2010 anticipated and actual financial performance;

	•		terms of employment agreements; and

	•		each Named Executive Officer’s annual incentive compensation plan that had been previously approved.

With respect to our Chief Executive Officer’s 2010 total compensation package, the Compensation Committee also considered the following:

	•		management’s goal of year-over-year improved earnings per share growth;

	•		management’s focus on strengthening our balance sheet;

	•		management’s strategic mission to increase profitability through sustained internal growth, including growth in recurring revenues;

	•		management’s directive to develop and deploy premier technology through continued investment;

	•		Mr. Marr’s contribution to the achievement of each of these strategic initiatives; and

	•		reference to levels of compensation of other chief executive officers of similar sized, publicly held companies and in similar industries.

After considering all of the ~~target bonus was earned if we achieved~~factors outlined in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the ~~approximate EPS issued~~Compensation Committee considered the overall compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers for 2010 to be appropriate and reasonable.

2011 Named Executive Officer Compensation

In February 2011, the Compensation Committee met and approved the total compensation packages for each of the Named Executive Officers for 2011, including our Chief Executive Officer. The 2011 total compensation packages will include the same components as ~~earnings guidance to~~2010 with the ~~public~~adjustments as set forth below.

Role of the Chief Executive Officer. In February 2011, our Chief Executive Officer, at the ~~beginning~~request of the ~~fiscal year. The payout level achieved in 2007~~Chairman of the Compensation Committee, attended the Compensation Committee meeting. Mr. Marr was asked to provide senior management’s philosophy regarding executive compensation and short- and long-term objectives for the ~~EPS Bonus Plan was 100%~~purpose of assisting the ~~target bonus.~~Compensation Committee in establishing 2011 total compensation for the Named Executive Officers. In addition, Mr. Marr ~~received~~was asked to present the results of the analysis of the Peer Group and Radford Survey as well as the financial outlook for 2011. Mr. Marr noted that the Named Executive Officers’ 2010 total compensation was below the median and mean as represented by the Peer Group. Mr. Marr made recommendations regarding 2011 base salary increases, annual bonus performance targets and related minimum and

maximum bonus payout potentials, and long-term incentives (stock option awards) for each Named Executive Officer, including himself. Mr. Marr also recommended adjusting the earnings per share calculation to the extent that growth in our year-over-year recurring revenue run rate exceeds our recurring revenue run rate growth target for incentive compensation purposes only. Recurring revenues (e.g., software maintenance and subscription arrangements) build long-term financial stability and drive long-term stockholder value; however, due to software revenue recognition rules, growth in our recurring revenues may not necessarily be reflected in a ~~discretionary bonus~~given year’s annual earnings per share performance. Mr. Marr noted that given the long-term stockholder value of ~~$50,000.~~increasing our recurring revenues, an annual incentive plan should not create any bias towards traditional software license sales versus the sale of or conversion to subscription-based arrangements. Therefore, adjusting our earnings per share to the extent that growth in our year-over-year recurring revenue run rate exceeds our growth target in calculating incentive compensation better aligns management and stockholder short-term and long-term interests and provides a more meaningful measure than growth in earnings per share alone. The recurring revenue financial measure will also be added to incentive plans throughout the organization. Mr. Marr was excused from the meeting after his presentation and did not participate in the Compensation Committee’s discussion of executive compensation for 2011. The Compensation Committee has the authority to accept, reject, or modify the Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations.

2011 Compensation Committee / Board of Director Actions. In February 2011, the Compensation Committee approved the following 2011 total compensation for the Named Executive Officers and other measures:

Base Salary. For ~~2008, based on~~2011, the ~~recommendations~~Compensation Committee approved a 2% increase for each of ~~management,~~ the ~~compensation committee set~~Named Executive Officer’s annual base salary.

Annual Cash Bonus. For 2011, the Compensation Committee elected to leave target bonus awards unchanged at 100% of base salary for Mr. Marr and Mr. ~~Womble;~~Womble, and 75% of base salary for Mr. Miller and Mr. Moore. The ~~minimum payout level under~~Compensation Committee further approved the ~~2008 EPS Bonus~~2011 Incentive Compensation Plan ~~is 0% of~~for the ~~target bonus while~~Named Executive Officers as well as all employees at graduated scale levels similar to the ~~maximum payout level is 170% of the target bonus. In addition,~~2010 Incentive Compensation Plan. To earn 100% of the target bonus ~~is earned if we~~under the 2011 Incentive Compensation Plan, the Company must achieve the ~~approximate EPS issued~~earnings per share goal of $0.79 to $0.819, as ~~earnings guidance~~adjusted on an after-tax basis to the ~~public at~~extent that our year-over-year annualized recurring revenue run rate exceeds our growth target. As of December 31, 2010, our annualized recurring revenue run rate was $162,059,940 and our target increase for 2011 is $15,000,000. Therefore, to the ~~beginning~~extent that our annualized recurring revenue run rate as of December 31, 2011 exceeds $177,059,940, then such excess shall be calculated on an after-tax basis and used to adjust our earnings per share for the sole purpose of computing incentive compensation. The target bonus is based on our operating plan and was reviewed by our Board of Directors. In order to achieve the threshold bonus of 40% of target, the Company must achieve 77% of the ~~fiscal year.~~as-adjusted earnings per share goal, or a range of $0.61 to $0.639.

Stock Options

~~Stock options are awarded~~. For 2011, the Compensation Committee preliminarily approved stock option grants to ~~executive officers~~the Named Executive Officers in an amount consistent with the 2010 stock option grants, which will be issued on or about June 15 and December 15, 2011, subject to ~~promote~~final approval by the Compensation Committee. Options granted to the Named Executive Officers in 2011 shall vest at 25% per year on the third through the sixth anniversary of the date of grant. The Compensation Committee believes that the delayed and extended vesting schedule emphasizes the long-term ~~success by~~nature of this compensation component, thereby further aligning ~~executive financial interests with~~ the interests of the ~~stockholder, provide~~Named Executive Officers with those of the stockholders.

Executive Compensation Recovery Policy. Accountability is a fundamental value to Tyler Technologies. To reinforce this value through our executive compensation program, the Board of Directors adopted an ~~opportunity~~Executive Compensation Recovery Policy in February 2010. The policy applies to our Named Executive Officers, division presidents, senior financial management, and division controllers and is included in the executive compensation plans for ~~increased equity ownership by executives, and maintain competitive levels~~each such individual beginning January 1, 2010.

Under this policy, if, in the opinion of ~~compensation. All awards~~the independent directors of ~~shares~~the Board, an executive engages in fraud or intentional misconduct that causes a material restatement of our ~~stock options are made at~~financial statements, then the independent directors shall have the discretion to use their best efforts to remedy the misconduct and prevent its recurrence. Based upon the facts and circumstances surrounding the restatement, the independent directors may direct us to recover all or ~~above~~a portion of any bonus or incentive compensation paid, adjust the ~~market price at the time of the award. Stock option grants are subject to time-based vesting as determined by the Compensation Committee.~~

Stock option award levels are determined based on executive responsibilities and are approved by the Compensation Committee. Newly hired or promoted executives who are eligible to receive options are awarded such options on the date of hire or promotion.

~~Other Compensation~~

Our executive officers previously entered into employment agreements which provide certain benefits and perquisites including severance pay that may be triggered as a result of the termination without causefuture compensation of the executive, ~~officer’s employment~~and dismiss, or ~~by a change~~take legal action against, the executive, in ~~control. All of~~each case as the independent directors determine is in our ~~executive officers are also eligible for benefits offered to employees generally, including life, health, disability and dental insurance, our 401(K) plan, and our Employee Stock Purchase Plan.~~best interests.

1727

The remedies that may be sought by the independent directors are subject to a number of conditions, including, that: (1) the bonus or incentive compensation to be recouped was calculated based upon the financial results that were restated; (2) the executive in question engaged in fraud or intentional misconduct; and (3) the bonus or incentive compensation calculated under the restated financial results is less than the amount actually paid or awarded.

Other Compensation Topics

Benefits. Our Named Executive Officers are eligible for the same benefits made available to other full-time employees generally, including our 401(k) Savings Plan, Employee Stock Purchase Plan, health and dental care plans, life insurance plans, disability plans, and other welfare benefit programs.

Severance and Change in Control Agreements. Our Named Executive Officers have employment contracts that provide for a severance payment equal to each executive’s base salary and target bonus and a non-compete payment equal to his base salary and target bonus upon the executive’s termination of employment without cause, or upon the executives’ termination of employment upon a change in control. In addition, upon a change in control all unvested options previously granted to each Named Executive Officer would immediately become vested and exercisable. For more information, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Employment Contracts.”

Tax Consequences of Certain Forms of Compensation

. The following is a summary of principal federal income tax consequences of certain transactions under our compensation plan. It does not describe all federal tax consequences of our compensation plan, nor does it describe state and local tax consequences.

Incentive Options

. No taxable income is generally realized by the optionee upon the grant or exercise of an incentive option. If shares issued to an optionee pursuant to the exercise of an incentive option are sold or transferred after two years from the date of grant and after one year from the date of exercise, then upon sale of such shares, any amount realized in excess of the incentive option price will be taxed to the optionee as a long-term capital gain, any loss sustained will be a long-term capital loss, and we will not be entitled to any deduction for federal income tax purposes. The exercise of an incentive option will give rise to an item of tax preference that may result in alternative minimum tax liability for the optionee.

If shares acquired upon the exercise of an incentive option are disposed of prior to the expiration of the two-year and one-year holding periods described above, generally the optionee will realize ordinary income in the year of disposition in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the shares at exercise over the option price and we will be entitled to deduct such amount. Special rules will apply where all or a portion of the exercise price of the stock option is paid by tendering shares.

Non-Qualified Options

. We also grant to executives non-qualified stock options that do not qualify for the tax treatment described above. No income is realized by the optionee at the time the option is granted. Generally, at exercise, ordinary income is realized by the optionee in an amount equal to the difference between the option price and the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise, and we receive a tax deduction for the same amount. At disposition, appreciation or depreciation after the date of exercise is treated as either short-term or long-term capital gain or loss depending on how long the shares have been held. Special rules apply where all or a portion of the exercise price of the non-qualified option is paid by tendering shares. Upon exercise, the optionee will also be subject to Social Security taxes on the excess of the fair market value over the exercise price of the option.

~~Report~~Employment Contracts

In February 2008, we entered into five-year employment agreements with John S. Marr, Jr., Dustin R. Womble, Brian K. Miller, and H. Lynn Moore, Jr. Under the terms of the agreements, Messrs. Marr, Womble, Miller and Moore will receive minimum base salaries of $395,000, $333,000, $250,000, and $250,000, respectively. They also participate in performance bonus or incentive compensation plans made available to our comparable-level employees and receive all employee benefits and perquisites normally offered to our executive employees. Each agreement provides for a severance payment equal to each executive’s base salary and target bonus and a non-compete payment equal to his base salary and target bonus upon the executive’s termination of employment without cause, or upon the executives’ termination of employment upon a change in control. A change in control is defined as our merger or consolidation into an unaffiliated entity, our dissolution or liquidation, the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, the acquisition by any person, entity or group of more than 50% of our voting stock,

or a change in the majority of our Board of Directors that was not approved by the then existing directors. In addition to the severance payment and the non-compete payment, each agreement also provides that we will continue to provide medical benefits for twelve months after the date of termination. In the event of a change in control, all unvested options previously granted to Messrs. Marr, Womble, Miller, and Moore would immediately become vested and exercisable.

In addition, the employment agreements provided that Messrs. Marr, Womble, Miller, and Moore be granted options to purchase respectively 400,000, 250,000, 150,000, and 150,000 shares of Tyler’s common stock. The options were granted at an exercise price equal to the closing market price of Tyler’s common stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange as of the effective date of the grant (May 15, 2008). The options vest in equal installments on the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth anniversary of the date of grant and are subject to terms and conditions of the 2000 Stock Option Plan and our standard option agreement under that plan.

We developed a standard severance package for our Named Executive Officers, because we believe it is necessary to attract and retain qualified executive officers and to minimize the distraction caused by a potential transaction and reduce the risk that an executive officer departs Tyler before an acquisition is consummated. We believe that a pre-existing plan allows our executive officers to focus on continuing normal business operations and on the success of a potential business combination, rather than on seeking alternative employment. We further believe that our employment agreements ensure stability and will enable our executive officers to maintain a balanced perspective in making overall business decisions during a potentially uncertain period. The Compensation Committee applied its best judgment in developing the severance package after considering each executive’s overall compensation package, the rapidly changing environment for technology-based companies, the average time required to obtain employment for equivalent job duties, and the amount of payment made to executives in the event of termination without cause or upon a change in control.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the ~~board~~Board of ~~directors,~~Directors, and the ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors has approved, that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

This report is submitted by the Compensation Committee.

Michael D. Richards, Chairman
J. Luther King, Jr.
G. Stuart Reeves

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

In 2010, the Compensation Committee consisted of Michael D. Richards (Chairman), J. Luther King, Jr., and G. Stuart Reeves. No member of the Compensation Committee was an officer or employee of Tyler. None of our executive officers served on the compensation committee or equivalent of any other entity.

1829

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the compensation paid to our ~~named executive officers~~Named Executive Officers for all of the services they rendered to us during ~~2007.~~2010, 2009, and 2008:


													Change in																	Change in
													Pension Value																	Pension Value
													and																	and
													Nonqualified																	Nonqualified
											Non-Equity		Deferred															Non-Equity		Deferred
							Stock		Option		Incentive Plan		Compensation		All Other										Stock	Option		Incentive Plan		Compensation	All Other
			Salary		Bonus		Awards		Awards		Compensation		Earnings		Compensation			Total				Salary		Bonus	Awards	Awards		Compensation		Earnings	Compensation			Total
Name and Principal Position	Year		($)		($)		($)		($) (1)		($)		($)		($)			($)		Year		($)		($)	($)	($) (1)		($) (2)		($)	($)			($)
John S. Marr, Jr.		2007	$	380,000	$	430,000	$	—	$	465,574	$	—	$	—	$	8,176		$	1,283,750		2010	$	420,000			$	557,201	$	210,000		$	16,101	(3)	$	1,203,302
Chief Executive Officer		2006		363,000		450,000		—		400,371		—		—		8,060			1,221,431		2009	$	407,000			$	457,551	$	447,700		$	9,901	(3)	$	1,322,152
and President																					2008	$	395,000			$	3,208,500	$	671,500		$	8,301	(3)	$	4,283,301

Dustin R. Womble		2007	$	320,000	$	320,000	$	—	$	388,891	$	—	$	—	$	19,170	(2)	$	1,048,061		2010	$	353,000			$	464,334	$	176,500		$	12,534	(4)	$	1,006,368
Executive Vice		2006		300,000		345,000		—		266,299		—		—		21,791	(2)		933,090		2009	$	343,000			$	381,293	$	377,300		$	16,471	(4)	$	1,118,064
President; Chief Executive Officer of both the Courts and Justice division and INCODE division
President; Chief																					2008	$	333,000			$	2,083,750	$	566,100		$	14,131	(4)	$	2,996,981
Executive Officer of both the Courts and Justice division and Local Government division

Brian K. Miller		2007	$	235,000	$	117,500	$	—	$	91,093	$	—	$	—	$	4,668		$	448,261		2010	$	265,000			$	371,468	$	99,375		$	9,726		$	745,569
Executive Vice President,		2006		220,000		126,500		—		56,269		—		—		1,023			403,792		2009	$	257,500			$	305,034	$	212,438		$	2,776		$	777,748
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Chief Financial																					2008	$	250,000			$	1,313,000	$	318,750		$	5,940		$	1,887,690
Officer and Treasurer

H. Lynn Moore, Jr.		2007	$	235,000	$	117,500	$	—	$	91,093	$	—	$	—	$	2,224		$	445,817		2010	$	265,000			$	371,468	$	99,375		$	7,350		$	743,193
Executive Vice President,		2006		220,000		126,500		—		56,269		—		—		60			402,829		2009	$	257,500			$	305,034	$	212,438		$	3,856		$	778,828
General Counsel and Secretary
General Counsel and																					2008	$	250,000			$	1,313,000	$	318,750		$	2,376		$	1,884,126
Secretary

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in ~~2007~~2010

The following table sets forth certain information relating to ~~stock option~~ grants of plan-based awards to the ~~“Named~~Named Executive ~~Officers”~~Officers during ~~2007.~~2010:


															All Other		All Other				Grant
															Stock		Option				Date Fair
															Awards:		Awards:				Value of
															Number of		Number of		Exercise or		Stock and				Estimated Future Payouts				All Other Option				Grant Date
			Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-						Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity						Shares of		Securities		Base Price		Option				Under Non-Equity				Awards: Number of		Exercise or		Fair Value of
	Grant		Equity Incentive Plan Awards						Incentive Plan Awards						Stock or		Underlying		of Option		Awards				Incentive Plan Awards (1)				Securities		Base Price of		Stock and
	Date		Threshold		Target		Maximum		Threshold		Target		Maximum		Units		Options		Awards		(2)		Grant		Target		Maximum		Underlying Options		Option Awards		Option
Name	(1)		($)		($)		($)		(#)		(#)		(#)		(#)		(#)		($/Sh)		($/Sh)		Date		($)		($)		(#) (2)		($/Sh)		Awards ($) (3)
John S. Marr, Jr.		3/2/2007	$	—	$	—	$	—		—		—		—		—		30,000	$	13.29	$	6.67		2/24/2010	$	420,000	$	756,000
		6/15/2007	$	—	$	—	$	—		—		—		—		—		30,000	$	12.26	$	6.25		6/15/2010	$	—	$	—		36,000	$	16.61	$	247,853
		12/14/2007	$	—	$	—	$	—		—		—		—		—		30,000	$	14.93	$	7.26		12/15/2010	$	—	$	—		36,000	$	21.11	$	309,348

Dustin R. Womble		3/2/2007	$	—	$	—	$	—		—		—		—		—		25,000	$	13.29	$	6.67		2/24/2010	$	353,000	$	635,400
		6/15/2007	$	—	$	—	$	—		—		—		—		—		25,000	$	12.26	$	6.25		6/15/2010	$	—	$	—		30,000	$	16.61	$	206,544
		12/14/2007	$	—	$	—	$	—		—		—		—		—		25,000	$	14.93	$	7.26		12/15/2010	$	—	$	—		30,000	$	21.11	$	257,790

Brian K. Miller		3/2/2007	$	—	$	—	$	—		—		—		—		—		15,000	$	13.29	$	6.67		2/24/2010	$	198,750	$	357,750
		6/15/2007	$	—	$	—	$	—		—		—		—		—		15,000	$	12.26	$	6.25		6/15/2010	$	—	$	—		24,000	$	16.61	$	165,236
		12/14/2007	$	—	$	—	$	—		—		—		—		—		15,000	$	14.93	$	7.26		12/15/2010	$	—	$	—		24,000	$	21.11	$	206,232

H. Lynn Moore, Jr.		3/2/2007	$	—	$	—	$	—		—		—		—		—		15,000	$	13.29	$	6.67		2/24/2010	$	198,750	$	357,750
		6/15/2007	$	—	$	—	$	—		—		—		—		—		15,000	$	12.26	$	6.25		6/15/2010	$	—	$	—		24,000	$	16.61	$	165,236
		12/14/2007	$	—	$	—	$	—		—		—		—		—		15,000	$	14.93	$	7.26		12/15/2010	$	—	$	—		24,000	$	21.11	$	206,232

Outstanding Equity Awards at Year-End

The following table shows outstanding equity awards for each of the ~~“Named~~Named Executive ~~Officers”~~Officers at December 31, ~~2007:~~2010:


											Stock Awards
	Option Awards											Market	Equity Incentive
					Equity Incentive						Number	Value of	Plan Awards:	Equity Incentive
	Number of		Number of		Plan Awards:						of Shares	Shares or	Number of	Plan Awards:
	Securities		Securities		Number of						or Units of	Units of	Unearned Shares,	Market or Payout	Option Awards
	Underlying		Underlying		Securities						Stock	Stock	Units	Value of Unearned	Number of Securities		Number of Securities
	Unexercised		Unexercised		Underlying						That Have	That Have	or Other	Shares, Units or	Underlying		Underlying		Option
	Options		Options		Unexercised		Option Exercise		Option		Not	Not	Rights That Have	Other Rights That	Unexercised Options		Unexercised Options		Exercise		Option
	(#)		(#)		Unearned Options		Price		Expiration		Vested	Vested	Not Vested	Have Not Vested	(#)		(#)(1)		Price		Expiration
Name	Exercisable		Unexercisable		(#)		($)		Date		(#)	($)	(#)	($)	Exercisable		Unexercisable		($)		Date
John S. Marr, Jr.		400,000		100,000		—	$	4.58		7/1/2013						200,000		—	$	4.58		7/1/2013
		40,000		60,000		—	$	7.52		7/26/2015						100,000		—	$	7.52		7/26/2015
		—		30,000		—	$	13.29		3/2/2017						18,000		12,000	$	13.29		3/2/2017
		—		30,000		—	$	12.26		6/15/2017						18,000		12,000	$	12.26		6/15/2017
		—		30,000		—	$	14.93		12/14/2017						18,000		12,000	$	14.93		12/14/2017
																160,000		240,000	$	15.00		5/15/2018
																12,000		18,000	$	14.98		6/13/2018
																12,000		18,000	$	12.14		12/15/2018
																6,000		24,000	$	16.33		6/15/2019
																6,000		24,000	$	19.20		12/15/2019
																—		36,000	$	16.61		6/15/2020
																—		36,000	$	21.11		12/15/2020

Dustin R. Womble		50,000		—		—	$	3.88		4/14/2009						22,014		—	$	3.60		3/4/2013
																121,614		—	$	4.58		7/1/2013
																100,000		—	$	7.52		7/26/2015
																80,000		20,000	$	11.02		7/26/2016
																15,000		10,000	$	13.29		3/2/2017
																15,000		10,000	$	12.26		6/15/2017
																15,000		10,000	$	14.93		12/14/2017
		22,014		—		—	$	3.60		3/4/2013						100,000		150,000	$	15.00		5/15/2018
		111,614		40,000		—	$	4.58		7/1/2013						10,000		15,000	$	14.98		6/13/2018
		40,000		60,000		—	$	7.52		7/26/2015						10,000		15,000	$	12.14		12/15/2018
		20,000		80,000		—	$	11.02		7/26/2016						5,000		20,000	$	16.33		6/15/2019
		—		25,000		—	$	13.29		3/2/2017						5,000		20,000	$	19.20		12/15/2019
		—		25,000		—	$	12.26		6/15/2017						—		30,000	$	16.61		6/15/2020
		—		25,000		—	$	14.93		12/14/2017						—		30,000	$	21.11		12/15/2020

Brian K. Miller		25,000		—		—	$	3.88		4/14/2009						54,188		—	$	7.52		7/26/2015
		15,000		—		—	$	1.62		5/8/2011						9,000		6,000	$	13.29		3/2/2017
		32,000		48,000		—	$	7.52		7/26/2015						9,000		6,000	$	12.26		6/15/2017
		—		15,000		—	$	13.29		3/2/2017						9,000		6,000	$	14.93		12/14/2017
		—		15,000		—	$	12.26		6/15/2017						60,000		90,000	$	15.00		5/15/2018
		—		15,000		—	$	14.93		12/14/2017						8,000		12,000	$	14.98		6/13/2018
																8,000		12,000	$	12.14		12/15/2018
																4,000		16,000	$	16.33		6/15/2019
																4,000		16,000	$	19.20		12/15/2019
																—		24,000	$	16.61		6/15/2020
																—		24,000	$	21.11		12/15/2020

H. Lynn Moore, Jr.		10,000		—		—	$	3.88		4/14/2009						80,000		—	$	7.52		7/26/2015
		33,333		—		—	$	1.62		5/8/2011						9,000		6,000	$	13.29		3/2/2017
		32,000		48,000		—	$	7.52		7/26/2015						9,000		6,000	$	12.26		6/15/2017
		—		15,000		—	$	13.29		3/2/2017						9,000		6,000	$	14.93		12/14/2017
		—		15,000		—	$	12.26		6/15/2017						60,000		90,000	$	15.00		5/15/2018
		—		15,000		—	$	14.93		12/14/2017						8,000		12,000	$	14.98		6/13/2018
																8,000		12,000	$	12.14		12/15/2018
																4,000		16,000	$	16.33		6/15/2019
																4,000		16,000	$	19.20		12/15/2019
																—		24,000	$	16.61		6/15/2020
																—		24,000	$	21.11		12/15/2020

~~Employment Contracts~~

Effective February 26, 2008, we entered into five-year employment agreements with John S. Marr, Jr., Dustin R. Womble, Brian K. Miller and H. Lynn Moore, Jr. Under the terms of the agreements, Messrs. Marr, Womble, Miller and Moore will receive minimum base salaries of $395,000, $333,333, $250,000 and $250,000, respectively. They will also participate in performance bonus or incentive compensation plans made available to comparable level employees of Tyler and receive all employee benefits and perquisites normally offered to Tyler’s executive employees. Each agreement provides for a severance payment equal to each named executive’s base salary and target bonus and a non-compete payment equal to his base salary and target bonus upon the executive’s termination of employment for Good Reason (as defined therein), or upon executives’ termination of employment upon a Change in Control (as defined therein). In addition to the severance payment and the non-compete payment each agreement also provides that we will continue to provide medical benefits for twelve months after the date of termination. In the event of a Change in Control, all unvested options previously granted to Messrs. Marr, Womble, Miller and Moore would immediately become vested and exercisable.

In addition, Messrs. Marr, Womble, Miller and Moore were contingently granted options to purchase respectively 400,000, 250,000, 150,000 and 150,000 shares of Tyler’s common stock subject to Tyler’s stockholders approving an amendment to increase the number of shares available for grant under the Option Plan and shall be effective as of the date the Option Plan is so amended. The options shall vest in equal installments on the first, second, third, fourth and fifth anniversary of the date of grant and shall be subject to terms and conditions of the Option Plan and Tyler’s standard option agreement. The options granted shall be issued at an exercise price equal to the closing market price of Tyler’s common stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange as of the effective date of the grant.


	Option Awards
	Number of Shares		Value Realized on
	Acquired on Exercise		Exercise
Name	(#)		($)
John S. Marr, Jr.		300,000	$	3,576,000

Dustin R. Womble		—	$	—

Brian K. Miller		15,000	$	173,700

H. Lynn Moore, Jr.		—	$	—

Potential Payments under Employment Contracts

The ~~named executive officers~~Named Executive Officers would have been eligible to receive the payments set forth in the table below had their employment been terminated on December 31, ~~2007,~~2010, including if a change in control had occurred during fiscal 2007. In order to provide the most meaningful disclosure, the table below assumes that the employment contracts entered into as of February 26, 2008 had been in effect as of December 31, 2007.2010.


											Termination Without Cause				Upon a Change in Control
	Termination Without Cause				Upon a Change in Control						Lump Sum				Lump Sum
	Lump Sum		Continuation of		Lump Sum				Accelerated		Severance and		Continuation of		Severance and		Continuation of		Accelerated
	Severance		Health Care		Severance		Continuation of		Vesting of Stock		Non-Compete		Health Care		Non-Compete		Health Care		Vesting of Stock
Name	Payment		Benefit		Payment		Insurance Benefit		Options		Payment		Benefit		Payment		Benefit		Options

John S. Marr, Jr.	$	1,580,000	$	10,956	$	1,580,000	$	10,956	$	851,652	$	1,680,000	$	12,084	$	1,680,000	$	12,084	$	2,536,843

Dustin R. Womble	$	1,333,000	$	11,041	$	1,333,000	$	11,041	$	1,064,106	$	1,412,000	$	12,181	$	1,412,000	$	12,181	$	1,863,420

Brian K. Miller	$	875,000	$	9,204	$	875,000	$	9,204	$	412,765	$	927,500	$	12,084	$	927,500	$	12,084	$	1,236,210

H. Lynn Moore, Jr.	$	875,000	$	9,120	$	875,000	$	9,120	$	412,765	$	927,500	$	12,180	$	927,500	$	12,180	$	1,236,210

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee assists the ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors in fulfilling its responsibilities for general oversight of the integrity of our financial statements, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the independent auditors’ qualifications and independence, the performance of our independent auditors, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and of our internal ~~controls~~control over financial reporting, and risk assessment and risk management. The Audit Committee manages the relationship with our independent auditors (who report directly to the Audit Committee). The Audit Committee has the authority to obtain advice and assistance from outside legal, accounting, or other advisors as the Audit Committee deems necessary to carry out its duties and to receive appropriate funding, as determined by the Audit Committee, from ~~the company~~us for such advice and assistance.

Management has the primary responsibility for our reporting process, including our systems of internal controls, and for preparing our financial statements. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed with management the audited financial statements contained in the Annual Report, including a detailed discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of the significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.

The Audit Committee meets with the independent auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the overall scope and plans for the audits and the results of their examinations. The Audit Committee reviewed with the independent auditors, who are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, their judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed under Statement of Auditing Standards No. 61, Communications with Audit Committees (SAS 61), as amended and as adopted by the ~~Audit Committee under generally accepted auditing standards.~~Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) in Rule 3200T. The Audit Committee also reviewed ~~managements~~management’s report on internal ~~controls~~control over financial reporting and the independent registered public accounting firm’s related opinions. In addition, the Audit Committee received from the independent auditors written disclosures regarding the auditors’ independence required by PCAOB Ethics and Independence Rule 3526, Communications with Audit Committees Concerning Independence, and has discussed with the independent auditors, the auditors’ independence from management and the company, including the matters in the written disclosures required by the Independence Standards Board, and considered the compatibility of non-audit services with theindependent auditors’ independence. The Audit Committee met ~~five~~four times during ~~2007.~~2010.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors (and the ~~board~~Board approved) that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2007~~2010 for filing with the SEC.

This report is submitted by the Audit Committee.

Donald R. Brattain, Chairman
J. Luther King, Jr.
G. Stuart Reeves

2535

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Our directors and executive officers seek approval from the ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors prior to entering into a business arrangement that ~~would~~may be deemed a ~~related party transaction.~~conflict of interest as described in our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Examples of transactions that may be considered a conflict of interest include:

	•		to receive or give more than a token value to anyone that has a business relationship with us;

	•		to lend to or borrow from individuals or concerns that do business with or compete with us, except banks and other financial institutions;

	•		to serve as an officer, director, employee, or consultant or receive income from any enterprise doing business with or competing with us;

	•		to own an interest in or engage in the management of an organization providing services or products to us, or to which we sell or compete, except when such interest (a) comprises publicly traded securities listed on a national securities exchange or the OTC margin list and (b) is not in excess of 5% of the securities of such company; and

	•		to knowingly cause, either directly or indirectly, us to enter into a business transaction with a close relative of the director or executive officer or a business enterprise of such relative.

In addition, we review, on an annual basis, our financial records to ensure all related party transactions are identified, quantified, and adequately disclosed. Also, each director and executive officer must disclose in writing any known related party transactions associated with completion of the annual director and officer questionnaire.

~~We employ Dane L. Womble, a brother of Dustin R. Womble. Dane L. Womble received $197,000 in salary and bonus compensation in fiscal year 2007 in exchange for services rendered.~~ In ~~fiscal year 2007,~~2010, we made ~~$1.8 million in~~ lease payments of $1.9 million for certain office space in Falmouth, Maine, ~~that is owned by~~to an entity in which ~~the~~Mr. Marr’s father and brother ~~of John S. Marr, Jr.~~ have ana 100% ownership interest. The lease is at current prevailing fair market rates for the area. John S. Marr, Jr. does not have an interest in the entity that leases property to ~~us.~~us and the lease arrangement existed at the time we acquired the division that occupies this property. We employ Dane L. Womble, a brother of Dustin R. Womble. Dane L. Womble received $225,192 in salary and bonus compensation in 2010 in exchange for services rendered.

MULTIPLE STOCKHOLDERS SHARING THE SAME ADDRESS

If you and other residents at your mailing address own shares of common stock in street name, your broker or bank may have sent you a notice that your household will receive only one Annual Report and proxy statement. This practice is known as “householding,” designed to reduce our printing and postage costs. However, if any stockholder residing at such an address wishes to receive a separate Annual Report or proxy statement, he or she may telephone the Investor Relations Department at 972-713-3714 or write to it at Tyler Technologies, Inc., 5949 Sherry Lane, Suite 1400, Dallas, Texas 75225, and a separate copy will be delivered to you promptly.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

Any proposal that a stockholder desires to present at the ~~2009~~2012 annual meeting must be received by us at our corporate headquarters no later than ~~January 18, 2009.~~December 1, 2011.


		By Order of the Board of Directors,


		H. Lynn Moore, Jr.
		Executive Vice President,
		General Counsel, and Secretary

Dallas, Texas
April ~~2, 2008~~1, 2011

2636

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF

TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

May ~~15, 2008~~10, 2011

NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIAL:
The Notice of Meeting, proxy statement and proxy card
are available at www.tylertech.com

Please sign, date ~~sign~~ and mail
your proxy card in the
envelope provided as soon
as possible.

ê↓ Please detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope provided. ê↓

20730304000000000000 1 051011

THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED BELOW. IF NO SPECIFICATION IS MADE,
THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE MATTERS SPECIFICALLY REFERRED TO BELOW.
PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HEREx


n1. Election of Directors:						~~20733000000000000000 2~~	~~051508~~


o	FOR ALL NOMINEES		NOMINEES: O Donald R. Brattain O J. Luther King, Jr. O John S. Marr, Jr. O G. Stuart Reeves O Michael D. Richards O Dustin R. Womble O John M. Yeaman

o	WITHHOLD AUTHORITY FOR ALL NOMINEES

o	FOR ALL EXCEPT (See instructions below)







INSTRUCTIONS:		To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark~~THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED BELOW. IF NO SPECIFICATION IS MADE,~~ ~~THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED~~ “FOR ~~THE MATTERS SPECIFICALLY REFERRED TO BELOW.~~ ~~PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE~~ALL EXCEPT”and fill in the circle next to each nominee you wish to withhold, as shown here:=			x










To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new address in the address space above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be submitted via this method.				o

FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
   1. Election of Directors: 2. Amendment to the Tyler Stock Option Plan. o o o
   o NOMINEES:
FOR ALL NOMINEES ¡ Donald R. Brattain
¡ J. Luther King, Jr. 3. Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors. o o o
   o WITHHOLD AUTHORITY ¡ John S. Marr, Jr.
FOR ALL NOMINEES ¡ G. Stuart Reeves 4. In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or adjournments thereof.
¡ Michael D. Richards
   o

FOR ALL EXCEPT
(See instructions below) ¡
¡ Dustin R. Womble
John M. Yeaman

INSTRUCTION:To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark“FOR ALL EXCEPT”and fill in the circle next to each nominee you wish to withhold, as shown here:=

To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new address in the address space above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be submitted via this method.

o

~~-->~~


			FOR	AGAINST	ABSTAIN
2.	Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors.		o	o	o

~~Signature of Stockholder~~	~~Date:~~	~~Signature~~	FOR	AGAINST	ABSTAIN
3.	Advisory vote on approval of ~~Stockholder~~ the compensation for the named executive officers.	~~Date:~~	o	o	o

		1 year	2 years	3 years	ABSTAIN
4.	Advisory vote on the frequency of a stockholder vote on executive compensation.	o	o	o	o


5.	In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or adjournments thereof.

Signature of Stockholder

Date:

Signature of Stockholder

Date:


n		Note:		Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.		n

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF

TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

May 10, 2011

PROXYVOTINGINSTRUCTIONS

INTERNET -Access “www.voteproxy.com” and follow the on-screen instructions. Have your proxy card available when you access the web page, and use the Company Number and Account Number shown on your proxy card.

Vote online until 11:59 PM EST the day before the meeting.

MAIL -Sign, date and mail your proxy card in the envelope provided as soon as possible.

IN PERSON -You may vote your shares in person by attending the Annual Meeting.



	COMPANYNUMBER


	ACCOUNTNUMBER

NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIAL: The Notice of Meeting, proxy statement and
proxy card are available at www.tylertech.com

¯ Please detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope providedIF you are not voting via the Internet. ¯

20730304000000000000 1 051011


1. Election of Directors:

o	FOR ALL NOMINEES		NOMINEES: O Donald R. Brattain O J. Luther King, Jr. O John S. Marr, Jr. O G. Stuart Reeves O Michael D. Richards O Dustin R. Womble O John M. Yeaman

o	WITHHOLD AUTHORITY FOR ALL NOMINEES

o	FOR ALL EXCEPT (See instructions below)

			n





INSTRUCTIONS:		To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark“FOR ALL EXCEPT”and fill in the circle next to each nominee you wish to withhold, as shown here:=










To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new address in the address space above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be submitted via this method.				o


			FOR	AGAINST	ABSTAIN
2.	Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors.		o	o	o

			FOR	AGAINST	ABSTAIN
3.	Advisory vote on approval of the compensation for the named executive officers.		o	o	o

		1 year	2 years	3 years	ABSTAIN
4.	Advisory vote on the frequency of a stockholder vote on executive compensation.	o	o	o	o


5.	In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or adjournments thereof.

Signature of Stockholder

Date:

Signature of Stockholder

Date:


Note:		Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.

PROXY

TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY

The undersigned hereby (1) acknowledges receipt of the Notice dated April ~~2, 2008~~1, 2011 of the annual meeting of stockholders of Tyler Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) to be held at the Park City Club, 5956 Sherry Lane, Suite 1700, Dallas, Texas, on ~~Thursday,~~Tuesday, May ~~15, 2008~~10, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. local time, and the proxy statement in connection therewith, and (2) appoints John S. Marr, Jr. and John M. Yeaman, and each of them, his proxies with full power of substitution and revocation, for and in the name, place and stead of the undersigned to vote upon and act with respect to, all of the shares of Common Stock of the Company standing in the name of the undersigned, or with respect to which the undersigned is entitled to vote and act at said meeting and at any adjournment thereof, and the undersigned directs that his proxy be voted as indicated on the reverse side hereof. If only one of the above proxies shall be present in person, or by substitute, at such meeting or any adjournment thereof, that proxy, so present and voting, either in person or by substitute, shall exercise all of the powers hereby given.

The undersigned hereby revokes any proxy or proxies heretofore given to vote upon or act with respect to such stock and hereby ratifies and confirms all that said proxies, their substitute or any of them may lawfully do by virtue hereof.

(Continued and to be signed on the reverse side)


n					~~14475~~	n

~~FOR~~

~~AGAINST~~

~~ABSTAIN~~

~~1. Election of Directors:~~

~~Amendment to the Tyler Stock Option Plan.~~

~~NOMINEES:~~

~~FOR ALL NOMINEES~~

~~Donald R. Brattain~~

~~J. Luther King, Jr.~~

~~Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors.~~

~~WITHHOLD AUTHORITY~~

~~John S. Marr, Jr.~~

~~FOR ALL NOMINEES~~

~~G. Stuart Reeves~~

~~In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or adjournments thereof.~~

~~Michael D. Richards~~

~~FOR ALL EXCEPT~~
~~(See instructions below)~~

¡
¡

~~Dustin R. Womble~~
~~John M. Yeaman~~

~~INSTRUCTION:~~~~To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark~~~~“FOR ALL EXCEPT”~~~~and fill in the circle next to each nominee you wish to withhold, as shown here:~~ =

To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new address in the address space above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be submitted via this method.

~~-->~~

~~Signature of Stockholder~~

~~Date:~~

~~Signature of Stockholder~~

~~Date:~~

~~Signature of Stockholder~~

~~Date:~~

~~Signature of Stockholder~~

~~Date:~~


n		~~Note:~~		Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.		n


*		Less than one percent of our outstanding common stock

(1)		Unless otherwise noted, the address of each beneficial owner is our corporate headquarters: 5949 Sherry Lane, Suite 1400, Dallas, Texas 75225.

(2)		“Direct” represents shares as to which each named individual has sole voting or dispositive power.


(1)		Represents ~~amounts expensed by us during 2007 for grants made to executive officers.~~aggregate grant date fair value of awards granted and calculated in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Stock Compensation. Such grants provide our executive officers the opportunity to purchase shares of Tyler common stock at some future date at the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant. ~~The dollar value of the stock option grants is based on the grant date fair value as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123R.~~ For additional information on the valuation assumptions ~~with respect to the 2007 expense,~~ refer to note 810 of the Tyler Technologies’ financial statements in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2007,~~2010, as filed with the SEC. ~~The SFAS No. 123R~~This fair value does not represent cash received by the executive in ~~2007,~~2010, but potential earnings contingent on ~~the~~ Tyler’s future performance. Stock option grants are designed to provide long-term (up to ten years) incentives and rewards linked directly to the price of our common stock. Stock options add value to the recipient only when stockholders benefit from stock price appreciation and, as such, further align management’s interest with those of our stockholders.

		Option awards in 2008 include stock options granted in connection with employment agreement renewals as well as normal recurring annual stock options grants.

(2)		These amounts consist of amounts earned under Tyler’s bonus plan for each respective year and paid in the following year.

(3)		All other compensation includes amounts contributed or accrued by Tyler under ~~the 401(K)~~our 401(k) Savings Plan, personal use of a company ~~owned car, value of the tax gross up for personal use of a company owned car,~~automobile by Mr. Marr and tickets to sporting events.

(4)		All other compensation includes amounts contributed or accrued by Tyler under our 401(k) Savings Plan, tickets to sporting events, a charitable donation made on behalf of Mr. Womble, and disability insurance premiums paid on behalf of Mr. Womble.


(1)		~~These~~The target and maximum plan award amounts reported in these columns are derived from our 2010 Bonus Plan. The actual payout amounts for 2010 are set forth in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of our Summary Compensation Table.

(2)		The options awarded on June 15, 2010 and December 15, 2010 were granted as part of Tyler’s broad-based annual stock option grant. The options vest and become exercisable ~~in five equal annual installments from~~25% per year on the third through the sixth anniversary of the date of grant and have a contractual term of ten years. The option terms are the same for all the options granted to employees on ~~March 2, 2007,~~ June 15, ~~2007~~2010 and December ~~14, 2007.~~15, 2010.

~~(2)~~(3)		The aggregate grant date fair value is determined in accordance with ~~SFAS No. 123R~~Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Stock Compensation, and does not represent cash received by the Named Executive Officers in ~~2007.~~2010. The grant date fair value represents potential earnings contingent on ~~the~~ Tyler’s future performance. Stock option grants are designed to provide long-term (up to ten years) incentives and rewards linked directly to the price of our common stock. Stock options add value to the recipient only when stockholders benefit from stock price appreciation and, as such, further align management’s interest with those of our stockholders.


	1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:


	2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:


		~~Yours very truly,~~


		~~JOHN M. YEAMAN~~
		Yours very truly, JOHN M. YEAMAN Chairman of the Board


	Page
THE ANNUAL MEETING		34
~~Place, Date, and Time~~General Information		3
~~Matters to be Considered~~		3
~~Record Date and Voting~~		3
~~Vote Required~~		34
Proxy Solicitation, Revocation, and Expense		34
PROPOSALS FOR CONSIDERATION		45
Proposal One — Election of Directors		45
Proposal Two ~~— Amendment to the Stock Option Plan~~		4
~~Proposal Three~~ — Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as Our Independent Auditors for Fiscal Year ~~2008~~2011		5
Proposal Three — Approval of an Advisory Resolution on Our Executive Compensation		6
Proposal Four — Approval of an Advisory Resolution on the Frequency of Stockholder Voting on Our Executive Compensation		6
TYLER MANAGEMENT		7
Directors, Nominees for Director, and Executive Officers		7
Business Experience of Directors, Nominees for Director, and Executive Officers		7
~~CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES AND BOARD MATTERS~~Board Diversity and Nominee Qualifications		9
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES		10
General Information		10
Corporate Governance Guidelines		910
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics		1011
Board Independence		1011
Committees and Meetings of the Board of Directors		1011
Board Leadership Structure		13
The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight		13
Audit Committee Financial Expert		1113
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures for Audit and Non-Audit Services		1113
Director Nominating Process		1214
Communications with ~~Our~~our Board of Directors		1315
Director Attendance at Annual Meetings		1315
SECURITIES OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT		1416
Security Ownership of Directors and Management		1416
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance		1517
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS		1618
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives		18
2010 Executive Summary Overview		1619
~~Executive~~ Compensation ~~Components~~Program Actions		1619
~~Base Salary~~Compensation Program Design		1619
~~Annual Cash Bonus Program~~Company Performance Review Process for Prior Fiscal Year		1722
~~Stock Options~~Setting Compensation for the Current Fiscal Year		1723
2010 Named Executive Officer Compensation		23
Role of the Chief Executive Officer		23
Analysis of Compensation Elements		23
Compensation Mix		26
Additional Considerations		26
2011 Named Executive Officer Compensation		26
Role of the Chief Executive Officer		26
2011 Compensation Committee/Board of Director Actions		27
Other Compensation Topics		1728
Benefits		28
Severance and Change in Control Agreements		28
Tax Consequences of Certain Forms of Compensation		18
~~Report of the Compensation Committee~~		18
~~EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION~~		19
~~Summary Compensation Table~~		19
~~Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2007~~		20
~~Outstanding Equity Awards at Year-End~~		21
~~Option Exercises and Stock Vested~~		2128
Employment Contracts		2228
~~Potential Payments under Employment Contracts~~Compensation Committee Report		22
~~Director Compensation~~		2329
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation		2429


	Page
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION		30
Summary Compensation Table		30
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2010		31
Outstanding Equity Awards at Year-End		32
Option Exercises and Stock Vested		33
Potential Payments under Employment Contracts		33
Director Compensation		34
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE		2535
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS		2636
MULTIPLE STOCKHOLDERS SHARING THE SAME ADDRESS		36
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS		2636

	•		the name and record address of the stockholder and any other stockholder known to be supporting the nominee; and

	•		the class and number of shares of our capital stock that are beneficially owned by the stockholder making the nomination and by any other supporting stockholders.


(3)		“Options Exercisable ~~Within~~within 60 Days” reflects the number of shares that could be purchased by exercise of options at March ~~17, 2008~~18, 2011 or within 60 days thereafter.

(4)		“Other” represents the number of shares of common stock as to which the named ~~individuals~~entity or individual share voting and dispositive power with another ~~person~~entity or ~~trust fund.~~individual(s).


(1)		Stock options expire on the tenth anniversary of the date of grant. Stock options granted prior to 2010 vest and become exercisable in equal installments on the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth anniversaries of the date of grant. Stock options granted in 2010 vest and become exercisable in equal installments on the third, fourth, fifth, and sixth anniversaries of the date of grant.


(1)		Non-employee directors receive the following compensation:

	•		An annual retainer of $25,000 for the chairman of the ~~audit committee~~Audit Committee and $15,000 for the other non-employee directors.

	•		A fee of $2,500 for each Board meeting attended in person and $1,250 for each Board meeting ~~attending~~attended via telephone.

	•		A fee of $2,500 for each ~~audit committee~~Audit Committee meeting attended in person and $1,250 for each ~~audit committee~~Audit Committee meeting attended via telephone.

	•		A fee of $1,000 for each ~~compensation committee~~Compensation Committee meeting attended in person and $500 for each ~~compensation committee~~Compensation Committee meeting attended via telephone.

	•		A fee of $1,000 for each ~~nominating~~Nominating and ~~governance committee~~Governance Committee meeting attended in person and $500 for each ~~nominating~~Nominating and ~~governance committee~~Governance Committee meeting attended via telephone.

	•		~~Each director is entitled to reimbursement~~Reimbursement for ~~his~~ reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with travel to and from, and attendance at, meetings of the Board of Directors or its committees and related activities.


	1) Amount Previously Paid:


	2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:


	3) Filing Party:


	4) Date Filed:



(2)		Represents ~~amounts expensed by us during 2007 for grants made to non-employee directors.~~aggregate grant date fair value of awards granted in 2010 and calculated in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Stock Compensation. Such grants provide our directors the opportunity to purchase shares of Tyler common stock at some future date at the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant. ~~The dollar value of the stock option grants is based on the grant date fair value as required by SFAS No. 123R.~~ In May ~~2007,~~2010, our directors were each granted options to purchase 5,000 shares of Tyler common stock at ~~$11.93~~$17.16 per share. The ~~SFAS No. 123R~~fair value for the options granted to our non-employee directors was actuarially determined to be ~~$5.78~~$6.61 per option share. This value does not represent cash received by our directors in ~~2007,~~2010, but potential earnings contingent on ~~the~~ Tyler’s future performance. Stock option grants are designed to provide long-term (up to ten years) incentives and rewards linked directly to the price of our common stock. Stock options add value to the recipient only when stockholders benefit from stock price appreciation and, as such, further align our director’s interest with those of our stockholders.

(3)		Total aggregate shares underlying outstanding stock options as of December 31, ~~2007~~2010 were ~~35,000.~~50,000.

(4)		Total aggregate shares underlying outstanding stock options as of December 31, ~~2007~~2010 were ~~35,000.~~50,000.

(5)		Total aggregate shares underlying outstanding stock options as of December 31, ~~2007~~2010 were ~~125,000.~~120,000.


(6)		Total aggregate shares underlying outstanding stock options as of December 31, ~~2007~~2010 were ~~45,000.~~

~~(7)~~		~~Other compensation includes costs associated with spousal travel to a Tyler function.~~60,000.


		~~THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED BELOW. IF NO SPECIFICATION IS MADE,~~ ~~THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE MATTERS SPECIFICALLY REFERRED TO BELOW.~~ ~~PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE~~	x